Re: Security issues are not discussed in this memo [was: A revolution...]
Steve Crocker via Internet-history <[email protected]> Mon, 11 May 2026 17:11:09 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.internet.history |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABf5zvKuw85CL-9=3_1eTKh21PKtjZ6q+S0DtdVLz=dKY+ZAvg@mail.gmail.com> |
Yes, October 1989 matches my recollection. Thanks. Steve On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 2:59 PM Brian E Carpenter < [email protected]> wrote: > According to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/past-members/, that > means about October 1989. > > Regards/Ngā mihi > Brian Carpenter > > On 11-May-26 18:07, Steve Crocker wrote: > > When the Security Area was created, I volunteered and was accepted as > the Area Director. IIRC, I suggested making Security Considerations a > required section in standards documents. > > > > It was not limited to crypto issues. > > > > Steve > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On May 11, 2026, at 12:31 PM, Brian E Carpenter via Internet-history < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On 11-May-26 12:09, Greg Skinner via Internet-history wrote: > >> ... > >>> I’m not sure what Andrew Sullivan meant by “give away.” IMO, the USG > had a much more liberal attitude towards 1970s and 1980s Internet > technology, as well as the Internet itself, than it did towards > cryptographic technology at that time. The history of PGP < > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy> provides an example of > this. If the Internet and/or Internet technology had been subject to > tighter access and export controls, neither might have (as easily) become > what they are today. (I realize there is a lot more to this, and would > welcome others who have much more experience than I do in this area to > comment.) > >> > >> When did people start to think seriously about security (which is much > more than cryptography, of course)? > >> > >> It was RFC 1311 (March 1992) that introduced the infamous phrase > "Security issues are not discussed in this memo" which was used quite > liberally for a long time. "Security Considerations" sections in RFCs seem > have become normal around 1989, but most of them were very weak for many > years. (At CERN, we saw elementary attacks from about 1986, mainly via > DECNET, and we first appointed a network security person in about 1988.) > >> > >> Of course, by the time the PGP mess came along, it was clear that NSA > and its friends were taking a lot of interest in the Internet, and we poked > the hornet's nest in the mid-1990s with RFC 1984. But DARPA funding was > gone by then. > >> > >> Regards/Ngā mihi > >> Brian Carpenter > >> -- > >> Internet-history mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history > >> - > >> Unsubscribe: > https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history > -- Sent by a Verified sender -- Internet-history mailing list [email protected] https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history - Unsubscribe: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history