Re: A revolution in Internet point-of-view - Was Re: Internet analyses (Was Re: IPv8...)
Steve Crocker via Internet-history <[email protected]> Mon, 11 May 2026 17:33:27 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.internet.history |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABf5zvLRobX2C6gYO_oj2Xs7DE6k8zBGinXWj0weadi77Wttpg@mail.gmail.com> |
In my previous note re The Little Garden, I wrote: I had a little bit of interaction with The Little Garden. I believe it was an independent effort without government funding, but others can speak more authoritatively. I was actually directly involved in one aspect of The Little Garden, but I wasn't a principal and had no involvement in its overall life. I worked for Trusted Information Systems (TIS), which had been founded and run by Steve Walker. Its headquarters were in Maryland. I joined TIS in late 1986 and opened the Los Angeles office, which I ran until I moved to Maryland in September 1989. We paid for a UUNET connection, which satisfied our needs at the time. A short time after opening the LA office, TIS also opened a very small office in the Bay Area. We wanted to connect them as well, but cost was an issue. I forget who approached whom, but Rick Adams permitted us to connect the Bay Area office, allowed The Little Garden to connect off of our line, and agreed to pay a portion of our costs. Rick did not generally permit UUNET customers to sell their connectivity to others, so this was a special favor. IIRC, John Gilmore took a liberal view of his rights, and went into business anyway adding other nodes. Steve On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 2:58 PM Karl Auerbach via Internet-history < [email protected]> wrote: > About the Little Garden ... > > I am sure that John G. will have many more details .. > > From the point of view of my company (Epilogue Technology) and John > Romkey (part of the company) we were getting rather tired of bumping > into barriers when we began to extend our connectivity beyond Usenet to > encompass the nascent Internet, especially in the San Francisco > peninsula area. > > John Romkey was our lead on this and one day he and I (and I think Dave > Bridgham) gathered with John G. and others at the Little Garden Chinese > Restaurant in Palo Alto to figure out what to do. I was essentially an > observer. > > I'm not sure who funded what - Epilogue might have contributed some $$, > but if we did it probably was not a lot. I think all of the money came > out of our own pockets, mostly Gilmore's. My company didn't really have > offices - many of us wee working out of our homes - and Romkey already > had a garage filled with Telebit modems and machines running usenet > stuff - I I don't remember the details except that it was a lot of > machines and wires and clearly something that grew ad hoc rather than > from a plan. I do remember the Pacific Bell telco people being amazed > at how many phone circuits were going into one house. > > Romkey's place was up on the hill in Belmont, my place was down at the > bottom of the hill, so all of our company networking went via Romkey's > garage. (I also got some net access courtesy John Rushby and his > Foonley Four machine at SRI [Rushby and I had worked together on > security stuff at SDC and at RSRE in Great Malvern in the UK.]) > > I was never very clear about how we were wired to the Little Garden or > for how long. > > Romkey got Postel to assign "aslyum.sf.ca.us" as a domain name for his > garage in Belmont, California. Eventually John moved it all back to > Boston - but still keeping the asylum.sf.ca.us domain name - and thus > being one of the first to break the idea of geographic allocation of > host and domain names. > > --karl-- > > > On 5/10/26 6:14 PM, Dave Crocker via Internet-history wrote: > > On 5/10/2026 5:49 PM, Vint Cerf via Internet-history wrote: > >> The regional networks were > >> partially funded by NSF but were required to become self- supporting > >> over a > >> 5 year period (initially 3). It was only in 1989 that UUNET, PSINET and > >> CERFNET were commercial operators... > > > > > > As an outside observer, I feel compelled to ask where The Little > > Garden fits into the funding model? > > > > d/ > > > > ps. As an inside participant, I feel compelled to note the the NSFNet > > funding/transition model was first tested 3 years earlier, with CSNet... > > > > > > d/ > > > > > -- > Internet-history mailing list > [email protected] > https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history > - > Unsubscribe: > https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history > -- Sent by a Verified sender -- Internet-history mailing list [email protected] https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history - Unsubscribe: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history