Fwd: Fw: Quantifying OSI
Alexander McKenzie via Internet-history <[email protected]> Mon, 11 May 2026 11:54:16 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.internet.history |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMusaY-kAu8TBipgM6nCfAX8x_0V7qYG336oxLQHs1xjRmRjPg@mail.gmail.com> |
Others from BBN who worked on the NIST contract to represent "the US Government's view" in OSI committees included John Burress (Transport Layer), e (Presentation Layer) and Kathy Huber (terminal support in the Application Layer, IIRC). However the majority of our work was done in committees of ANSI, where the "US position" was developed. ANSI meetings were roughly every 3 months. Between meetings we developed position papers based on input from NIST and from ARPAnet/Internet experience. As part of this project Tom Blumer developed a protocol compiler which took in a "formal" description of a protocol in a c-like language describing a protocol state machine and output a procedure implementing the protocol. However, any progress we made in getting the OSI system to resemble the good parts of ARPAnet/Internet experiments was summarily dismissed by people like Jon Postel, Dave Clark, and Mike Padlisky as "Not Invented Here" when we attempted to report back to the ARPAnet/Internet community. Ultimately it didn't much matter; the superior funding of implementations by ARPA, and the "give it away freely" attitude toward those implementations, carried the day. Cheers, Alex *From:* Craig Partridge via Internet-history < [email protected]> *To:* Carl Malamud <[email protected]> *Cc:* Carl Malamud via Internet-history <[email protected]> *Sent:* Monday, May 11, 2026 at 10:48:43 AM EDT *Subject:* Re: [ih] Quantifying OSI For a chunk of time, NIST funded a bunch of BBN folks to attend including Ross Callon (whom, I understand, did a big chunk of the heavy lifting on CLNP) and Debbie Deutsch (ASN.1 and I think parts of X.400). They used to meet in the cafeteria periodically to brush up on their (I think French?) language skills. Craig On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 8:29 AM Carl Malamud via Internet-history < [email protected]> wrote: > Guessing NIST had a ton of employees going to ISO meetings, perhaps a FOIA > request (or several) is in order. Imagine they will have copies of meeting > minutes, enough to start to estimate the number of attendees and number of > meetings. > > -- ***** Craig Partridge's email account for professional society activities and mailing lists. -- Internet-history mailing list [email protected] https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history - Unsubscribe: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history -- Internet-history mailing list [email protected] https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history - Unsubscribe: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history