Re: Fwd: Fw: Quantifying OSI
Bob Purvy via Internet-history <[email protected]> Mon, 11 May 2026 09:07:06 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.internet.history |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFq6nVF3T85Ebchci1xyDb92y7nakWgTTwfG-q5OtPCgESM9FQ@mail.gmail.com> |
"Quantifying" : this is a good way to approach this. Everyone focuses on the money, especially from the USG, but there's also "implementation hours": How many hours did OSI proponents spend actually writing code and getting networks running? Writing papers and going to meetings doesn't count. On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 8:54 AM Alexander McKenzie via Internet-history < [email protected]> wrote: > Others from BBN who worked on the NIST contract to represent "the US > Government's view" in OSI committees included John Burress (Transport > Layer), e (Presentation Layer) and Kathy Huber (terminal support in the > Application Layer, IIRC). However the majority of our work was done in > committees of ANSI, where the "US position" was developed. ANSI meetings > were roughly every 3 months. Between meetings we developed position papers > based on input from NIST and from ARPAnet/Internet experience. As part of > this project Tom Blumer developed a protocol compiler which took in a > "formal" description of a protocol in a c-like language describing a > protocol state machine and output a procedure implementing the protocol. > However, any progress we made in getting the OSI system to resemble the > good parts of ARPAnet/Internet experiments was summarily dismissed by > people like Jon Postel, Dave Clark, and Mike Padlisky as "Not Invented > Here" when we attempted to report back to the ARPAnet/Internet community. > Ultimately it didn't much matter; the superior funding of implementations > by ARPA, and the "give it away freely" attitude toward those > implementations, carried the day. > > Cheers, > Alex > > *From:* Craig Partridge via Internet-history < > [email protected]> > *To:* Carl Malamud <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Carl Malamud via Internet-history <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, May 11, 2026 at 10:48:43 AM EDT > *Subject:* Re: [ih] Quantifying OSI > > For a chunk of time, NIST funded a bunch of BBN folks to attend including > Ross Callon (whom, I understand, did a big chunk of the heavy lifting on > CLNP) and Debbie Deutsch (ASN.1 and I think parts of X.400). They used to > meet in the cafeteria periodically to brush up on their (I think French?) > language skills. > > Craig > > On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 8:29 AM Carl Malamud via Internet-history < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Guessing NIST had a ton of employees going to ISO meetings, perhaps a > FOIA > > request (or several) is in order. Imagine they will have copies of > meeting > > minutes, enough to start to estimate the number of attendees and number > of > > meetings. > > > > > > -- > ***** > Craig Partridge's email account for professional society activities and > mailing lists. > -- > Internet-history mailing list > [email protected] > https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history > - > Unsubscribe: > > https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history > -- > Internet-history mailing list > [email protected] > https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history > - > Unsubscribe: > https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history > -- Internet-history mailing list [email protected] https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history - Unsubscribe: https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history