Re: they won't allow you to use facts to embarrass them
"Keith J. Schultz" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.e-books.gutenberg.volunteers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Greg, I would tend to agree with you that quality should be the driving force. Yet, how do you rank quality: 1) amount of errors. No brain as such 2) quality of formatting 3) quality for creating different output formats 4) quality of the output formats 5) quality of the source Quality assessment is a big can of worms. Furthermore, who does the quality assessment? regards Keith. Am 19.11.2012 um 02:12 schrieb Greg Newby <[email protected]>: > This sounds like "2" to me. > > As has been said before, the "real" problem is that the best prepared > eBooks are often not found first. Instead, orderingis based on > popularity, which tends towards self-reinforcement. It would be nice > for the search engine at www.gutenberg.org to rank by quality, not > just popularity, when similar titles are found. All we need is a good > way of assessing quality. > > -- Greg _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d