Re: they won't allow you to use facts to embarrass them
Lee Passey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.e-books.gutenberg.volunteers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/24/2012 11:12 PM, James Adcock wrote: > IMHO the best solution to keep customers from downloading crap versions is > not to offer them -- or to fix them. Ahh, but that kind of begs the question doesn't it? We don't want to keep people from downloading crap versions, we just want to be sure they /know/ they're getting crap versions. And how are we going to know that any particular version /is/ a crap version? What we do know, is that we can't trust the opinion of Marcello Perathoner, James Adcock, David Widger, Bruce Morasch, Greg Newby or even Lee Passey. We /can/ probably trust the quality of HTML books produced of late by Distributed Proofreaders, but it would appear that no one is interested in downloading the recent work product of DP. So, you have failed to address Mr. Newby's core question, which is "how do we determine the quality of any arbitrary PG edition?" I'm sure that any concrete proposal you would care to make would be genuinely appreciated. _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d