Re: they won't allow you to use facts to embarrass them
Karen Lofstrom <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.literature.e-books.gutenberg.volunteers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJmeNVNt-+r=HvC0rx3tCZ9uDQ02oE8yLS=4DMPBXG-aDkjqww@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Lee Passey <[email protected]> wrote: > So, you have failed to address Mr. Newby's core question, which is "how do > we determine the quality of any arbitrary PG edition?" I'm sure that any > concrete proposal you would care to make would be genuinely appreciated. User vote? Set up a page for each work with multiple versions. The page should link to all editions; this is the page that should appear when someone searches for the work. Perhaps add info re date of submission and whether the version has been done by one volunteer or by DP. Ask PG users who have downloaded one or another of the versions, or read enough online to judge, to vote on accuracy and user-friendliness. Over time, the better versions should accumulate more votes. -- Karen Lofstrom _______________________________________________ gutvol-d mailing list gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected] http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d