Re: they won't allow you to use facts to embarrass them

That is an idea I love: just make a "related books" tab on each page,
and put the various revisions/versions/editions or whatever you name
them on the top of the list, then translations and derived works, etc.

Shouldn't be too hard to add to the site.

Jeroen.

On 2012-11-25 22:21, Karen Lofstrom wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Lee Passey <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> So, you have failed to address Mr. Newby's core question, which is "how do
>> we determine the quality of any arbitrary PG edition?" I'm sure that any
>> concrete proposal you would care to make would be genuinely appreciated.
> 
> User vote? Set up a page for each work with multiple versions. The
> page should link to all editions; this is the page that should appear
> when someone searches for the work. Perhaps add info re date of
> submission and whether the version has been done by one volunteer or
> by DP.  Ask PG users who have downloaded one or another of the
> versions, or read  enough online to judge, to vote on accuracy and
> user-friendliness. Over time, the better versions should accumulate
> more votes.
> 
> --
> Karen Lofstrom
> _______________________________________________
> gutvol-d mailing list
> gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected]
> http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d
> 

_______________________________________________
gutvol-d mailing list
gutvol-d-4LCm/o+qPMZ96Xl/[email protected]
http://lists.pglaf.org/mailman/listinfo/gutvol-d