Re: Re: Romance Publisher Launches Kickass Antipiracy Campaign

joseph harris <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.literature.ebook-community
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 13/06/2011 02:55, Jon Jermey wrote:
> On 10/06/11 17:06, auwg wrote:
>    
>> 'radically curtailing the effectiveness'? With a few piratical key
>> words? :) Heh.
>> Strongly stated, Jon.
>> *Defensively* stated, actually. And with apparent great relief.
>> Why the great relief to think that piracy is unstoppable?
>> Just curious.
>>      
> Because it galls me to see great advances for the human race held back
> by legal constraints that were designed when the most effective copying
> system was a scriptorium full of monks.
>    

Jon,

You must stop this quite incorrect history. Recognisable copyright did 
not start until the eighteenth century. The monks were part of the Roman 
Empire/Roman Catholic Church which did not permit citizens and 
worshippers to read the scriptures at all. Not copyright issues but 
control. No other religion had such a system, and the RC issue was 
chiefly in Europe. Outside those there was not a great deal of written 
material before the Renaissance anyway.
> Imagine that you still legally had to drive your 150 hp automobile at 5
> mph, with a man carrying a red light walking in front, just because the
> red light manufacturers and the Walking In Front Union had a
> stranglehold on the legislature. That's the current situation with
> eBooks -- except that the speed is coming down over time from 5 to 4 to
> 3 mph...
>
> Regards,
>
> Jon.

As to your analogy, apart from a connection of technological advance, 
there is no similarity between the red flag and any aspect of copyright. 
Your correct targets might be contracts and company laws. Apart from the 
worthy efforts of several organisations like Gutenberg Press, there is 
no advantage to the reader and consumer of the free for all you support.

Specifics like term are certainly arguable. My only problem over them is 
that there seems to be no principle on which to base the current, a 
shorter, or a longer period. What does irk me about the 'free copying' 
argument you support is the absolute contempt it carries towards the 
creator of new works.

Joseph


------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------
Post a message:   ebook-community [[at]] *
Unsubscribe:      ebook-community-unsubscribe [[at]] *
Switch to digest: ebook-community-digest [[at]] *
Switch to normal: ebook-community-normal [[at]] *
Put mail on hold: ebook-community-nomail [[at]] *
Administrator:    ebook-community-owner [[at]] *

(* == yahoogroups.com)
-------------------------------------------------------Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ebook-community/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ebook-community/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    ebook-community-fullfeatured-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    ebook-community-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.