Re: re Re: NP Bushspeak

But Clinton attempted to look proactive and decided, and he certainly succeeded in commanding more respect. 

Bush flabs--he is not even pendular, he is merely depleting airspace and timespace and banging our whimpers. Equilibrium makes for easy,, wheedling speeches to excite the nods of the world (thrilling, Georgie), that´s all very well...but the sad thing here is...he, himself, actually seems to believe he is SAYING SOMETHING TO SOME AVAIL.

My eternal commiseration for his fine and proficiently narcoleptic person.

--Monica
--- Paul Mackin <[email protected]> wrote:
>Monica Belevan wrote:
>
>> I don´t know about the speech´s equilibrium--it´s obviously the same preclear bollocks an optimistic fifth grader could say. It doesn´t promote any viable action, for beetter or worse, and is simply Bush playing his old lampshade role for the Republican tourniquet in Washington. He has a way with all things lackluster which permits him what in theory should be the assets of a crafty politician ( mainly, saying nothing with persuasive, evocative efficiency), but he is not even convincingly alive..
>
>Monica--you are wise beyond your years.  The Israel-Arab wars began at exactlly the same moment in history as did my own adult existtence (21 in '47) and will surely outlast the latter.  American presidents have to appear to be trying to promote a solution and they must do it n a way that will be least damaging to themselves. The words they use are never going to be pretty. Clintons' were naturally prettier than Bush's but if the difference is of that great importance, somebody please tell me. You
>may be the girl to do so.
>
>
>p.

_____________________________________________________________
FREE E-mail Accounts @ SURREALestate.com 
http://www.surrealestate.com/email.html

_____________________________________________________________
Promote your group and strengthen ties to your members with [email protected] by Everyone.net  http://www.everyone.net/?btn=tag