National LambdaRail President Explains Research Focus

David Farber <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.culture.people.interesting-people
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Begin forwarded message:

From: NLR News <[email protected]>
Date: October 13, 2006 6:34:59 PM EDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NLR-News] National LambdaRail President Explains Research  
Focus

> From today's HPCwire, The Leading Source for Global News and  
> Information
Covering the Ecosystem of High Productivity Computing

http://www.hpcwire.com/hpc/978148.html

National LambdaRail President Explains Research Focus
By Tom West, President
National LambdaRail



   I have been asked: Why is National LamdbaRail (NLR) focusing so much
   on facilitating network research and "big" science applications as  
its
   core mission? Is it not as important to give equal or greater
   attention to the networking needs of the broader research and
   education (R&E) community?

   In answering these questions, permit me to draw a comparison to the
   historical development and evolution of the great cities around the
   world.

   When investing in real estate today, you are told that the principle
   focus should be on Location! Location! Location! The root of this
   principle is evident in the development and evolution of the major
   cities and regions around the globe. In most instances, the selection
   of the location for each of these cities was based on such strategic
   factors as: safety and security; access to basic necessities and
   resources; transportation; and, the potential to develop commerce. As
   each city's core developed and prospered, the community grew and
   expanded geographically. Over time, each great city not only evolves,
   but also periodically reinvents its core in order to stay vibrant and
   respond to the changing needs of the society. The cycle, never  
ending,
   continues to repeat itself as new needs drive evolutions.

   From my perspective, the development and evolution of networking in
   our R&E community has followed a similar cyclic path over the past
   four decades with the start of each cycle focused on Research!
   Research! Research!

   In the late 60s, the revolutionary developments in packet networks  
and
   related technologies came from university researchers. Combined with
   DARPA's funding and deployment of the ARPAnet, these innovations
   created the initial core technologies and seminal implementation for
   the Internet. From that era forward, both research inventions and the
   specific needs of the researchers have been the core drivers for the
   major advances in networking for the general R&E community as well as
   for society at large.

   Inspired by the pioneering researcher-driven development of APRAnet,
   the beginning network needs of the broader university and lab
   community were addressed by a major expansion and evolution of the
   ARPAnet and by the implementations of BITNET and CSnet. Together  
these
   efforts were able to bring much larger numbers of institutions online
   enabling broad use by researchers, educators, students and even
   administrators. By leveraging additional platforms (in BITNET's case
   via what were often institutional IBM mainframes reconfigured by
   computer center folks to enable a few forms of network capabilities)
   and funding sources, these much larger numbers established fertile
   ground for creating and deriving the benefits of what Metcalf came to
   call "network effects."

   In the late-1980s, the cycle renewed itself with the research
   community-driven convergence on the increasingly evolved core  
Internet
   protocols of the ARPAnet. Our research community created related
   usable network capabilities and applications like broadly usable
   email, ftp and listserv. And, to meet the growing needs of
   researchers, the use of networks in R&E became a key driver in the
   creation and rapid expansion, evolution and extension of the Internet
   protocol-based networks such as NSFnet, ESnet and DREN. As a  
companion
   to and major enabler of the NSFnet, regional research and education
   networks (the NSF Regionals) were developed as the most powerful  
means
   for extending the reach of, democratizing access to, and sustaining
   R&E networks by explicitly recognizing and addressing the diverse
   geographical and demographic realties of networks.

   Advanced networking for the researchers and our larger R&E community
   suffered a serious setback in the early 1990's when NSFnet became a
   victim of its own success and was 'privatized' and the program
   discontinued. This came during a cycle in which many of the regional
   R&E networks and research community-based Internet providers were  
spun
   off, and either became or were sold off to the emerging commercial
   ISP's. While this helped enable the worldwide Internet revolution, it
   unfortunately left most of the R&E community without either a  
voice in
   (let alone control over) network capabilities and services, or direct
   access to innovating with (or configuring around) underlying network
   technology. The good news was that "our" Internet had become
   pervasive. The bad news was that we had lost nearly all control and
   were reduced to buying one-size-fits-all capabilities that were being
   evolved for mass market rather than research, education and clinical
   needs. And our network researchers had lost the ability to do network
   and network-based research and to innovate in those areas in big  
ways.

   With the discontinuation of the NSFnet, the NSF sought to address the
   high-end advanced networking infrastructure needs and  
opportunities of
   the researchers with support for the vBNS program. This initiative,
   combined with the CoREN and other activities of the surviving
   Regionals, sustained the continuing regionals and stimulated their  
and
   other regional group's evolution into GigaPops. The GigaPops, in  
turn,
   worked for the creation of UCAID (the corporate entity underlying
   Internet2) and the development of the Abilene Network in a  
partnership
   with Qwest and Nortel. With this new cycle, our community enabled the
   formation of a state-of-the-commercial-art, packet-over-SONET shared
   layer 3 service and the ability to control bandwidth and topology.
   During this period, state/regional networks and GigaPops grew and
   developed rapidly to meet the burgeoning educational needs throughout
   the community.

   Shortly after the beginning of this century, three new drivers  
emerged
   that called for a major leap forward in advanced networking to meet
   the needs of the researchers in the community and the community at
   large. These included:

   Need One: More and more manageable bandwidth for "big" or specialized
   applications' research


   * High-end science needs terabits and petabytes


   * Predictable quality interconnect


   * Immersive (i.e. often high-resolution and low latency) presence


   * Deterministic control loops


   * Bit rate of reality-10 gigabits soon to be 40 gigabits, but more
   importantly given the realities of the instruments and cluster
   computers and storage systems many parallel 10 gigabits

   Need Two: Breakable and researcher-controlled networks including  
waves
   for network research


   * New protocols


   * New devices


   * New architectures

   Need Three: Underlying owned fiber


   * Ensuring that the limitations on what our communities can pursue  
are
   based on what we can imagine and afford, rather than what services
   telecommunications companies are willing to sell us and the  
conditions
   under which they are willing to sell them


   * Enabling partnering in truly new optical domains


   * Keeping prices from providers low

   The result, National LambdaRail (NLR), has been the implementation of
   a fully operational national networking physical infrastructure based
   upon owned and lit fiber. This fiber is linked with multiple Regional
   Optical Network (RON) physical infrastructures that are RON-owned. By
   enabling the implementation of multiple networks, both experimental
   and production, to facilitate technology innovation, discovery and
   sharing of new knowledge, this new networking collaboratory is
   providing for the concurrent advancement of:


   * Network research;


   * Next generation network-based research applications in science,
   engineering, medicine and other disciplines; and,


   * Education program delivery at all levels -- K through 20.

   By focusing on facilitating Research! Research! Research!, NLR, in
   partnership with the RONs, continues the network innovation cycle and
   ensures that all the participants in the research and education
   community reap the benefits of big, fast, customizable networks. The
   reality is that researchers are the innovators -- the folks who think
   big and drive myriad ways to create the networks of the future today.
   We in the R&E community can effectively learn from them and extend  
and
   recreate these innovative networks for universities, labs, the  
greater
   educational community as well as our society at large.

   The cycle continues. What are the next drivers? Let's all learn
   together by serving and studying Research! Research! Research!

   -----

   Tom West is President and Chief Executive Officer of National
   LambdaRail, a major initiative of U.S. research universities and
   private sector technology companies to provide a national scale
   infrastructure for research and experimentation in networking
   technologies and applications. Over the years, West has served as an
   advisor and consultant to a number of higher education institutions
   and systems, private corporations and state governments. West has  
been
   actively involved in national research and education networking in  
the
   United States for nearly two decades.

_______________________________________________
News mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.nlr.net/mailman/listinfo/news
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.