Re: only a constant factor worse than optimal
Dave Long <[email protected]> Thu, 4 Jul 2013 00:47:03 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.people.kragen.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> It's well known that you can buy sufficient nutrition for a > dramatically lower cost than a normal diet. FWIW, we recently bought a 25 kg animal feed bag of rolled oats for = under 20 CHF (~110 ARS for ~400 MJ?), and, with Samuel Johnson's = definition in mind, tried some. They're actually very palatable, far better dry than I remember = instant oatmeal ever having been. We're tempted to take some* home = to use for oatmeal or m=FCesli. How does this compare to the staples in your spreadsheet? -Dave PS. Unfortunately I've lost the reference but apparently there was a = ca. WWI or WWII british cookbook that contained at least one recipe = that was called a variation of "life-sustaining glop". * but certainly not a bag's worth. Note that for agricultural = purposes, this is retail, not bulk. Bulk comes palletized, = (600-800kg?), and the next step up are large sacs delivered by = integrated truck/crane units, followed by trucks that directly load = small silos. Keep in mind that although bovines and equines eating = hay prepared with the other species in mind will survive, they won't = thrive. But I doubt oats have as many parameters as hay. Some = differences between livestock and human oats (pace Johnson) seem to = be given by: http://www.agric.wa.gov.au/objtwr/imported_assets/ = content/fcp/cer/oat/oat_grain_quality.pdf -- = To unsubscribe: http://lists.canonical.org/mailman/listinfo/kragen-discuss