Re: Buying vs renting
Lucas Gonze <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.people.rohit-khare |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACvjfPmOrN=Mx0NXUaJg69Yt6stwCNHR9WmV_dLN2idQxMo90w@mail.gmail.com> |
That all makes sense but the last part. His friend's estate would have been worth more if he'd taken the month by month savings and put them in a stock index fund. On Feb 28, 2018 7:24 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I've read the responses and the best example I have is the following: > > My father joined the US Navy straight out of High School along with > his best friend. They both served in the USN for 20 years and both > retired with full benefits. They both got married at around the same > time and they both had 2 kids. They both were rotated around the > country every 2 years. The major difference is my father always > bought and sold a private home (every 2 years) when changing duty > stations. His friend always stayed in on-base family housing paid > for by the USN. When they both retired to their original home town, > my father had bought his home outright ($185,00.00). He didn't have > a monthly house payment for a 1600 sq/ft house on a wooded 1 acre lot. > His friend also bought a similar house ($165,000.00) 5 miles away on > similar property and had to pay $1024.00 month out of his > retirement, (which my father didn't have to do). My father, with > the savings, was able to buy a boat and RV, his friend just scraped > by. When my dad died his estate was worth approximately $425,000.00 > and when his friend died, his estate was worth around $35,000.00. > I find this was the best argument for buying over renting (when > renting was free in this situation). > > Regards > > Sent from my IBM Selectric III > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Friends of Rohit Khare" <[email protected]> > To:"FoRK Rohit Khare" <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent:Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:00:27 -0800 > Subject:Re: [FoRK] Buying vs renting > > > On Feb 27, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Marty Halvorson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Despite Tom's excellent thoughts on the subject, my observation is > this: All the money spent renting is benefiting only the owner of the > rental unit. > > Presumably you get use of the unit you are renting. The common > fallacy of renting as “throwing away money” is predicated on the > renter and the owner having an identical cost basis for the same > place. This assumption is rarely true. Renting is often a way to split > the difference between your cost basis to buy and the owner’s lower > cost basis. In such cases, there is literally no way for you to come > out ahead by buying the same place no matter how you try to explain > the numbers unless you are loaded with cash (which is probably a bad > investment of said cash). And this is the case more often than not in > the US. > > I find the arguments that some people gain emotional or psychological > benefits from buying more compelling than arguments for financial > benefits. Of course, the calculus is a bit different if you plan on > living in the place you buy for the rest of your life. Admittedly, I > have not gotten to the “last place I am going to live” stage yet. > > _______________________________________________ > FoRK mailing list > http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork > > _______________________________________________ > FoRK mailing list > http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork > _______________________________________________ FoRK mailing list http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork