[CAnet - news] Will GENI be a Magic Lamp or a Dim Bulb -- IEEE Internet Computing
"Bill St.Arnaud" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.news |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <02bd01c5f687$0eeb59d0$1321bdcd@amarillo> |
For more information on this item please visit the CANARIE CA*net 4 Optical Internet program web site at http://www.canarie.ca/canet4/library/list.html ------------------------------------------- [Some excerpts from IEEE Computing article. From posting on Dave Farber's IPer list -- BSA] http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/mags/ic/2005/06/w6007.pdf Without much fanfare, a sweeping new networking research initiative was announced at the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communications (SIGCOMM) conference at the end of August. Presented as part of the works-in progress session, the US National Science Foundation's (NSF) Global Environment for Networking Investigations (GENI; www.nsf.gov/cise/geni/) was so unheralded beforehand that even conference coordinator Joe Touch, director of the Postel Center at the University of Southern California's Information Sciences Institute and inventor of the X-Bone overlay technology, didn't know about the initiative. How revolutionary might GENI be? Its stated goals are to research the development of nothing less than a "clean slate" Internet. According to the NSF, the GENI initiative will support the research, design, and development of new networking and distributed systems capabilities by . creating new core functionality -going beyond the existing paradigms of datagram, packet, and circuit switching and designing new network-management paradigms and naming, addressing, and identity architectures; . developing enhanced capabilities - building security into the architecture; designing for high availability; balancing privacy and accountability; and designing for regional differences and local values; . deploying and validating new architectures - incorporating emerging technologies (wireless sand optical, for example) and new computing paradigms enabled by pervasive devices; . building higher-level service abstractions - using, for example, information objects, location-based services, and identity frameworks; . building new services and applications - developing principles and patterns for distributed applications as well as making large-scale distributed applications secure, robust,and manageable; and . developing new network architecture theories - investigating network complexity, scalability, and economic incentives. New Era for Funding? Over the long term, GENI might succeed in some or all of its goals. But in the near term, the initiative signals a potential tectonic shift in the way the US research community proposes funding projects. Computer science researchers and US Congressional science experts have been concerned about several trends under Darpa, which has funded and overseen the bulk of large-scale Internet architecture research since the network's incubation days. For example, the proposed fiscal year 2006 budget for the US Networking and Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD) program is US$2.15 billion, down slightly from last year's $2.2 billion (www.aaas.org/spp/ rd/06pch23.htm Every university Web site I visited advertised that they had created centers for multidisciplinary research and professed that these centers were the harbinger of the future. What must be happening is that, while computer science is always part of the multidisciplinary efforts, its past dominance and, hence, respective share [of funding] must be decreasing in relationship to the other disciplines involved in the effort." Jennifer Rexford, professor of computer science at Princeton University and one of the movers behind GENI, says the universal dependence on the Internet might be a factor in bringing more people to believe major improvements - up to and including a "clean slate" initiative - need to happen, no matter who funds such a program. "In the last couple of years, the security and network management problems have become so serious there's an erosion of trust in the Internet itself," Rexford says. "There's also a growing sense we're at risk of losing our edge in IT competitiveness globally. In talking to deans and administrators, there's a lot of talk that other countries are making a bigger push and our own funding situation is grimmer. There's a feeling that it's ripe for some big agenda to help drive us to do something more efficient." ------------------------------------- To SUBSCRIBE: send a blank e-mail message to [email protected] To UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email message to [email protected] ------------------------------------- These news items and comments are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect those of the CANARIE board or management. ----------- [email protected] www.canarie.ca/~bstarn skype: pocketpro SkypeIn: +1 614 441-9603 ----------- [email protected] www.canarie.ca/~bstarn skype: pocketpro SkypeIn: +1 614 441-9603 _______________________________________________ news mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canarie.ca/mailman/listinfo/news