[CAnet - news] 2007 - The Big year for Broadcast TV over the Internet?
"Bill St.Arnaud" <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:45:36 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.news |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <01ff01c76ca9$e5c16c80$6401a8c0@amarillo> |
For more information on this item please visit my blog at http://billstarnaud.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------- [Around the world broadcasters are preparing plans to launch delivery of prime time TV shows over the Net. CBS is rumoured to be planning a major initiative to offer all their prime TV fare over the Internet a day before it is broadcast on the airwaves. The new Apple TV box may also provide a significant incentive as it allow TV viewers to wirelessly connect their computer to the TV in order to watch movies and shows downloaded or streamed over the Internet. A good example of this trend is in New Zealand where the national broadcaster is making all their video fare available to download over the Net (but so far they have decided not to use P2P like BitTorrent for file transfer). With the advent of Joost and Internet triple play companies like Inuk, 2007 could be the big year for broadcast TV over the Internet. The biggest stumbling block besides the last mile bandwidth problem, still seems to be content and protection rights - I find it hard to imagine the current content business model will survive which is entirely dependent on failed DRM schemes, take-down orders and lawyers. Thanks to pointers from Donald Clark and Dewayne Hendricks -- BSA] I found a site where you can get streaming video of lots of current and old TV shows, plus a selection of other media types such as anime. Its called 'TV Links': <http://www.tv-links.co.uk/>. Worth checking out if you're interested in catching up on some shows that you've missed over the years. For instance, I've checked out some early episodes in the 'Black Adder' series from the UK. The video and sound quality is surprisingly good. -- Dewayne Television NZ Ltd has just launched its on demand TV services. A limited, but fair, offering originally (don't know if some of it is restricted on geographical location). They are working hard on the copyright for more content. http://tvnzondemand.co.nz/content/ondemand_index/ondemand_skin Using Akamai around the country to spread the network load - but at 200MB+ per 1/2 hr show, this will cripple even further the limited regional backhaul NZ has and further the growing clamour for "more fibre in the ground" and for community-backed open access passive infrastructures. >From David Farber's IPer list Begin forwarded message: Hi-def's DRM: Dead with Rigor Mortis: In a timely illustration for the camp that contends Digital Rights Management doesn't work, never did and never will (see "Jobs endorses unchained melodies"), the proud hackers over at the Doom9 forums announced their latest breakthroughin high-definition DVDs. Previously, hackers had found ways, albeit cumbersome, to uncover the "volume key" that would unlock individual Blu-ray and HD DVD discs (see "You couldn't seem to agree on one standard, so we took the liberty of hacking them both for you"). Now a hacker known as Arnezami has teased out the "processing key" that can be used to unlock, decrypt, and backup every HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc film on the market. As Cory Doctorow notes at BoingBoing, this is a copy-protection scheme that took years to develop and it was broken wide open in weeks. "For DRM to work, it has to be airtight. There can't be a single mistake. It's like a balloon that pops with the first prick. That means that every single product from every single vendor has to perfectly hide their keys, perfectly implement their code," Doctorow writes. "There is no future in which bits will get harder to copy. Instead of spending billions on technologies that attack paying customers, the studios should be confronting that reality and figuring out how to make a living in a world where copying will get easier and easier. They're like blacksmiths meeting to figure out how to protect the horseshoe racket by sabotaging railroads." >From Dewayne's list Why piracy is still more common than legal video downloads 12/27/2006 9:27:38 AM, by Ryan Paul <http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061227-8500.html> A recent study conducted by consumer and retail analysis group NPD claims that peer-to-peer (P2P) video downloads (which in the study are synonymous with illegal downloads) are outpacing purchases from legitimate video download services five to one. The study, which was performed with NPD's VideoWatch tracking software on "the home computers of more than 12,500 U.S. households," states that 8 percent of Internet-using households downloaded video content from P2P services, whereas 2 percent paid to download video content from legitimate providers. The study also indicates that nearly 60 percent of video files downloaded from P2P sites were adult-film content, while 20 percent was TV show content and 5 percent was mainstream movie content. Avast, matey! Opt-in! The opt-in methodology used by NPD could lead to significant under- reporting of P2P downloading since those who are voluntarily tracked by NPD's software are probably going to be less inclined to violate copyright law. Chances are that the ratio of "legal" to "illegal" downloading is further tipped in piracy's favor than NPD's study indicates. Nevertheless, assuming that NPD's study approximates reality, one could attribute the strength of piracy and the limited adoption of commercial and P2P-based video downloading to several factors. First, legal movie download services are still relatively new, and the movie industry's trepidation has prevented a diverse body of content from becoming commercially available. I still don't know of any legal video download service that offers my favorite episodes of Babylon 5, for instance. If the new digital economy is all about the so-called "Long Tail," then online video stores are missing a major opportunity by not playing their cards and rapidly expanding their selection. This is doubly true since the "selection" of content available on the P2P networks is truly impressive. P2P wins the the selection category hands down. This is doubly true when you consider that NPD found that 60 percent of P2P downloads were pornographic in nature. Another obvious factor is Content Restriction Annulment and Protection (CRAP) technologies, more commonly known as DRM. Consumers who pay for digital video downloads want to be able to play those videos with the software of their choice, without a lot of trouble or the imposition of additional limitations. Consumers also want to be able to convert legitimately downloaded content to other formats so that it can be played on mobile devices. Pervasive DRM and high prices make legal video downloading much less appealing to the average consumer. ------------------------------------- To SUBSCRIBE: send a blank e-mail message to [email protected] To UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email message to [email protected] ------------------------------------- These news items and comments are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect those of the CANARIE board or management. ----------- [email protected] [email protected] www.canarie.ca/~bstarn skype: pocketpro SkypeIn: +1 614 441-9603 _______________________________________________ news mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canarie.ca/mailman/listinfo/news