The Straight Dope 06/30/2006
[email protected] Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:00:00 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.straight-dope |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTMANAGER-2907760-1859562-2006.06.30-04.00.02--gcps-straightdope-list#[email protected]> |
The Straight Dope -- By Cecil Adams http://www.straightdope.com You are subscribed as: [[email protected]] To unsubscribe CLICK on the URL below this line: mailto:[email protected] If you can't "click" above, then send a blank email to: [email protected] ____________________________________________ THE STRAIGHT DOPE 06/30/2006 Dear Cecil: When I'm feeling cynical about well-publicized criminal trials, I sometimes use the timeworn phrase "they've never hung a millionaire in the U.S." Certainly I can't think of one. But is it true? --Timothy G. Merker, Chicago ~~~~~~ Looking for the perfect gift for that wedding, birthday, or bar mitzvah? Straight Dope books are the very thing! See http://www.straightdope.com/store.html ~~~~~~ Cecil replies: If the expression "You simply cannot hang a millionaire in America," attributed to politician and orator William Bourke Cockran (1854-1923), is timeworn, Tim, it's not from overuse--Google turns up a big four hits. That tells you something about U.S. attitudes right there, because the fact is, while a few millionaires have gone to the gallows (chair, whatever), we haven't hanged many. Let's count: Labor racketeer Louis "Lepke" Buchalter made millions in the 1920s and '30s. Under investigation for extortion and murder, Lepke--head of the notorious organized-crime hit squad nicknamed Murder, Inc.--waged a "war of extermination" against potential informants. Dozens died, but the scorched-earth policy backfired, encouraging targets to take their chances with the law; one witness at Buchalter's eventual murder trial in 1941 agreed to testify only after being shot in the head on Buchalter's instructions. Buchalter was convicted despite spending an estimated quarter million on his defense. He appealed as far as the U.S. Supreme Court but was finally electrocuted in 1944. That's one. For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/060630.html STRAIGHT DOPE CLASSIC #1 - 08/12/1988 Dear Cecil: Does an airplane have a lighter load after the passengers have consumed their rubber chicken and plastic vegetables? --R.C., Evanston, Illinois Dear R.: Food doesn't cease to exist merely because somebody swallowed it, beanbrain. The only time a plane's mass decreases is if something gets dumped out or falls off, e.g., an engine, cabin wall, etc. Ignoring the minor reduction in weight due to the loss of moisture and carbon dioxide to the outside atmosphere during air recirculation (which would occur whether the passengers ate anything or not), the plane's load stays the same. We'll also ignore--I hate to have to throw all these qualifications in here, but I'm surrounded by nitpickers--weight loss due to jet fuel consumption during the meal. Next time ask something a little more challenging, like whether, if a passenger tosses a baseball into the air, the plane's weight decreases by the weight of the baseball (5 to 5-1/2 ounces, for you sticklers). Amazing answer on request. THE TEEMING MILLIONS POUNCE For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_144.html STRAIGHT DOPE CLASSIC #2 - 06/17/1988 Dear Cecil: If you're driving your car at the speed of light and put your headlights on, what happens? - -Rob M., Sausalito, California Dear Rob: Man, what are you guys in Sausalito on, anyway? As anyone with even the most tenuous grasp of the theory of relativity knows, the speed of light is constant for any inertial observer. Does that answer your question? I didn't think so. Let me put it another way. Suppose you're zipping down to the Dairy Queen in your Hyundai at 0.99c--in other words, 99 percent of the speed of light. While en route you flip on the high beams and perform various subtle and ingenious experiments that I will not describe here. You discover that the light from the headlamps is traveling away from you at (surprise!) the speed of light. In other words, your headlights operate normally. Now suppose a stationary observer at the side of the road performs the same experiment on the same beam of light. She (her name is Myra) discovers that the beam is moving away from her at speed c also. But how can this be, you ask? Since I'm going nearly the S. of L. to start with, shouldn't that give the photons emitted by the headlamps a running start, so to speak, enabling them to travel nearly twice the speed of light with respect to Myra? For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_143.html ____________________________________________ Here's how you can get your OWN FREE Subscription: Send a blank mailto:[email protected] ____________________________________________ Copyright 1995 - 2006 Chicago Reader, Inc. All Rights Reserved You may forward this document by email ONLY if you include the entire document INCLUDING the information at the bottom of this publication ____________________________________________ Visit our good friends at Joke A Day http://www.jokeaday.com They're kind enough to mail THE STRAIGHT DOPE for us. Join the World's Largest Daily Humor List and receive daily laughs in your email by sending mailto:[email protected]