The Straight Dope 07/07/2006
[email protected] Fri, 07 Jul 2006 04:00:01 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.publications.straight-dope |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTMANAGER-2907760-1870943-2006.07.07-04.00.02--gcps-straightdope-list#[email protected]> |
The Straight Dope -- By Cecil Adams http://www.straightdope.com You are subscribed as: [[email protected]] To unsubscribe CLICK on the URL below this line: mailto:[email protected] If you can't "click" above, then send a blank email to: [email protected] ____________________________________________ THE STRAIGHT DOPE 07/07/2006 Dear Cecil: As tires wear out, rubber is presumably deposited on the road surface. Where is all that rubber? --R.D. Morgan, Camden, South Carolina ~~~~~~ Looking for the perfect gift for that wedding, birthday, or bar mitzvah? Straight Dope books are the very thing! See http://www.straightdope.com/store.html ~~~~~~ Cecil replies: All over the place, bud--including maybe in your lungs. For a long time conventional wisdom had it that tire particles were too coarse to do much harm and simply wound up as one more component of urban grit. Now we know better. Asthma and latex allergies have been on the rise in recent years, and some think tire dust is why. Tires are a mix of materials, mostly synthetic and natural rubbers but also including carbon black, oil, sulfur, steel, and chemicals added as antioxidants, strengtheners, and fillers. They also contain varying amounts of potentially hazardous metals such as zinc, nickel, chromium, cadmium, and copper. As you drive, and especially as you corner and brake, your tires continually abrade against the road surface, and to some extent wear away just due to flexing as they roll along. This tire wear takes the form of rubber left on the road, heavy particles that quickly settle on the road and shoulder, and lighter particles that become airborne. For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/060707.html STRAIGHT DOPE CLASSIC #1 - 04/30/1993 Dear Cecil: Why are there pushbuttons at intersections that say "push me and traffic will stop so you can cross quicker," or something like that? It doesn't work! I wouldn't say I'm neurotic about it, but about 15 years ago I quit my job to hitchhike around the USA to find a push- to-walk traffic signal that would actually stop traffic. After countless pairs of shoes and as many near-misses with cars, I can say that without a doubt none of these traffic signals provide the pedestrian with a quicker cross. What's going on? If I'm right maybe we can work some kind of lawsuit scam! -- Markus T. Pellicori, Baltimore Cecil replies: I like a man who takes things seriously, Markus, but just the same I'm glad you weren't my partner in chem lab. The usual explanation for the apparent inertness of push-to-walk buttons is the foolish expectations of users, who think the buttons will instantly bring traffic to a screeching halt. Satisfying though many hassled pedestrians would no doubt find this, it would also result in a lot of rear-end collisions. Instead, P-T-W buttons are set up so the "walk" signal lights at some nondisruptive point in the signal cycle, e.g., shortly after the previous signal up the street goes red. Since many suburban stoplights are on a two-minute-plus cycle, many impatient pedestrians erroneously conclude the button is broken. Or so the engineers say. However, Cecil has been lied to before. I decided the only way to be sure was to stake out an actual P-T-W button, which happened to be at the crosswalk (no cross street) outside the traffic court building in downtown Chicago. During the Friday afternoon rush I spent half an hour pushing that damn button without any observable effect at all. It was 25 seconds "walk," 50 seconds "don't walk," button or no. For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_153.html STRAIGHT DOPE CLASSIC #2 - 07/31/1992 Dear Cecil: Since elementary school I have repeatedly heard the story of how Manhattan was bought from the Indians for a mere $24 worth of trinkets. Something about this has long troubled me. Assuming the value of the barter items was estimated at about the time of the famous transaction, shouldn't it be adjusted for all those years of inflation? Maybe Manhattan wasn't such a steal after all. --Charles R. McNeill II, Washington, D.C. Dear Charles: Sometimes this job is too easy. In 1626 Peter Minuit bought Manhattan island from the local Indians for a load of cloth, beads, hatchets, and other odds and ends then worth 60 Dutch guilders. According to my Encyclopedia Britannica, 60 guilders in 1626 would buy you 1-1/2 pounds of silver. Naturally we assume this is troy weight, 12 ounces to the pound. Silver lately has been selling for a little more than $4 per troy ounce. Ergo--sorry, but a man in my position needs to say ergo once in a while--Minuit got the core of the Big A for $72 in today's money. (Lest you think the price of beads has increased remarkably slowly in the last 350 years, you should know that the $24 calculation was made in the 19th century.) There are some who would contend that $72 or even $24 for Manhattan was not such a hot bargain. These people are mostly . . . For more, see: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_156.html ____________________________________________ Here's how you can get your OWN FREE Subscription: Send a blank mailto:[email protected] ____________________________________________ Copyright 1995 - 2006 Chicago Reader, Inc. All Rights Reserved You may forward this document by email ONLY if you include the entire document INCLUDING the information at the bottom of this publication ____________________________________________ Visit our good friends at Joke A Day http://www.jokeaday.com They're kind enough to mail THE STRAIGHT DOPE for us. Join the World's Largest Daily Humor List and receive daily laughs in your email by sending mailto:[email protected]