Re: on original sin
Charmi Miller <[email protected]> Sun, 08 Feb 2004 17:45:04 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.religion.muslim.progressive |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hmmmm..... a few stray comments. (have been without my computer for a number of days - a lot to catch up on. and, it turns out i hadn't receive a number of the messages in the middle of this discussion when i posted -- just got my computer back, and just got 92 new messages. you people have had mighty busy fingers. hehehe... also, i didn't realize my school's webmail would send my message without my name - that must have seemed a bit rude, or presumptuous.) ok, so let's see... well, i also grew up in a catholic family, though always in a situation of religious minority, so perhaps because of that we weren't as traditional as those who identify as "roman catholic" rather than .. plain ol catholic. (our northern relatives always said "roman catholic". that apparently means little or nothing to most southern protestants - merely 'catholic' was strange enough.) so, being your basic run of the mill catholics, we didn't follow a lot of standard practices, like ..indulgences, matins, etc. according to what i was taught one of the basic differences between catholics and protestants is that, unlike protestants, catholics do not engage in the concept of salvation - that that is a strictly protestant way of thinking. also, catholics regard the bible as more of an historical document intended for guidance through contemplation of its lessons than anything else, with the exception of the specified ten commandments of god. those were the only "thou shalts" and "thou shalt nots" which appear in the bible which we considered to be direct commandments from god. to us, the bible was not to be unnecessarily scrutinized, memorized, or quoted. br na'eem, yes, i think it is easy to say the transitional functions of baptism and shahadah are analagous. and, as br moo has said, in many protestant faiths, especially those similar to the baptists, you take baptism as one would take shahada: only when you are of age, as a choice to accept god. it is only catholics who baptize their children as tiny infants soon as they are old enough to be taken into a public situation. so i guess it's more accurately two analogies: one between born muslims and catholics, and one between muslims who choose to come to islam and protestants who choose to come to their faith through baptism. the religions are not enemies, nor at odds -- i don't really understand why there is so much competition for "rightness" among christians, muslims, and jews. as far as i know, since all three are religions of the one god, enmity seems improper. i would think you just learn as much as you can, and guide others, never attacking them. this might just be my own perspective though - i choose to try never to quibble, and when i find that i've fallen into it i try as hard as i can to get out as quickly as possible. here are two pieces of advice i heard in the movie ghost dog, from two samurai masters whose names i didn't catch. i really like this way of thinking when it comes to human interaction.... 1. matters of great concern should be treated lightly. 2. matters of small concern should be treated seriously. charmi