RE: RE: ProgressiveMuslims digest, Vol 1 #417 - 1 msg
"Kate Ahmad" <[email protected]> Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:34:19 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.religion.muslim.progressive |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Salaam Sofia, They are interesting thoughts. That certainly is a better way of looking at it. Its just hard to judge from western society where the idea of my husband taking a slave and having sex with her is so abhorrent. But everything needs to be looked at in context I guess. Wa'salaam aisha >From: "Sofia Memon" <[email protected]> >Reply-To: [email protected] >To: <[email protected]> >Subject: RE: [Progressivemuslimsnetwork] RE: ProgressiveMuslims digest, Vol >1 #417 - 1 msg >Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:57:26 -0500 > >Salaams Aisha, > >I've always thought that this provision regarding sex with slaves had to >be read in it's historical context and in light of the other, more >numerous provisions that require the freeing of slaves in atonement or >in lieu of other fard acts (such as fasting). I interpret the >provisions about slaves, taken in their totality, to indicate that Allah >is pleased with the freeing of slaves. I have a hard time wrapping my >head around the fact that there is no clear prohibition of slavery and >the excesses it engenders, but I guess it's possible that in the >historical context of the Qur'an immediate freedom of all slaves may >have actual been to the detriment of many of those who were enslaved at >that time including >1)the catastrophic withdrawal of subsistence of too many women and >children >2)physical abuse from everyone, as the (protected) property of no one >---I'm thinking, for example of Somalia: the dissolution of >infrastructure and formal heirarchies has resulted in increased violence >and abuse for everyone... >I realize this is an easily corruptible argument for those who'd like to >see the power status quo remain... >Just some thoughts over lunch. Alhamdulilah for lunch and for relative >freedom. > >Sofia > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >Kate Ahmad >Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 5:57 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: [Progressivemuslimsnetwork] RE: ProgressiveMuslims digest, >Vol 1 #417 - 1 msg > > >Asalaamu alaikum, >I respectfully disagree with your point on polygamy. >While Allah states that it is possible for men to take 4 wives, he then >goes >on to state that they must be treated equally and that it is impossible >to >do that. So, if read fully, the Quran does not condone polygamy, in >fact it >states that it cannot be done in a lawful manner. >So to me, polygamy is not allowed. Allah tests us by making us think >about >his words. There would be nothing to discover and strive for if >everything >was written in point form. That is why there is a hadith that states >'Any >scholar who issues an opinion will be rewarded once if it is wrong, and >twice if it is right.' > >On another point, sex with slaves is not something I can condone in my >mind >- can anybody justify it? > >Wa'salaam >Aisha > > > >From: "y2" <[email protected]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: <[email protected]> > >Subject: [Progressivemuslimsnetwork] RE: ProgressiveMuslims digest, Vol > > >1 > >#417 - 1 msg > >Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:10:28 -0500 > > > >Salaams, > > > >Well, to start off with. I have my suspicions as to the intentions of > >this question, but I'll bite anyways. > > > >1. A muslim is never alloed to be unfaithful. You are NOT allowed to > >have sex with slaves as if they're objects. > > > >As I was taught, the idea of 'slaves' as mentioned in the koran are > >refered to in 2 contexts. I of course had questions on reading the > >English translation of slaves, and it was explained in this context. 1. > > >The recognition that slaves did exist at that time. And the koran has > >no fear addressing this problem and thus declares way to free slaves > > > >2. 'slaves' as those captured in battle has more to do with the > >concept of the modern prisoner of war. And thus, you most certainly > >withhold from them some rights, but their children and what not must be > > >born free. You can most certainly marry one of this POWs...They can > >and should be exchanged with your own POWs. > > > >The possibility of multiple wives is of course something that is there. > >Its > >a matter of responsbility and circumstance. Most certainly in times of >war > >if many men died, it would be reasonable if a man could have more than >one > >woman. This has nothing to do with a faithfulness. The man is still > >required to be faithful to his wives, equally. > > > >The 'ease' of divorce is nothing to be exploited by anyone. Those who > >do are committing a sin. Why would GOD make it difficult for two > >people who cannot continue as a family to divorce? > > > >I would first question the basis of each of your points (1-3) before > >jumping > >to the next stage of conclusions. > > > >Yameen > > > > > Message: 1 > > > From: "talib ul-Haq" <[email protected]> > > > To: [email protected] > > > Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:25:03 +0000 > > > Subject: [Progressivemuslimsnetwork] More on Sex > > > Reply-To: [email protected] > > > > > > Salaams everyone > > > > > > The usual take on this sex is that it is sacred etc. This is a > > > useful message to propogate at a time of HIV/AIDS. > > > > > > Yet, several issues make me wonder if, however useful, and however > > > desperate I am to make the argument, this is an argument that can > > > really withstand > > > Qur'anic scrutiny. Let's look at the following > > > > > > a) the phenomenon of temporary marriage - even if no longer > > > applicable, i.e., mansukh > > > b) the ease of divorce > > > c) the possibility of four wives > > > d) the permissability of sex with any amount of slaves > > > > > > The prohibition on Zina is a matter completely aside. This > > > prohibition says nothing about the sanctity of sex or the need for > > > one partner. It may say > > > some stuff about fidelity, or the sanctity of marriage. > > > > > > The dominant Islamic message has been one of 'be faithful" - the B > > > in the ABC. Does this faithfulness have anything to with the > > > sanctity of sex inside > > > marriage? If yes, then why can I have as many other sexual > > > partners as I > > > want as long as I own them? > > > > > > Salaams > > > > > > Talib > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Need info in a hurry? Use MSN Search! http://search.msn.co.za/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ProgressiveMuslims mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://willo.nitric.co.za/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progressivemuslim > > > s > > > > > > > > > End of ProgressiveMuslims Digest > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >ProgressiveMuslims mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://willo.nitric.co.za/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progressivemuslims > >_________________________________________________________________ >Find love today with ninemsn personals. Click here: >http://ninemsn.match.com > > >_______________________________________________ >ProgressiveMuslims mailing list >[email protected] >http://willo.nitric.co.za/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progressivemuslims > > > >_______________________________________________ >ProgressiveMuslims mailing list >[email protected] >http://willo.nitric.co.za/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progressivemuslims _________________________________________________________________ You could be a genius! Find out by taking the IQ Test 2003. $5.50 (incl GST). Click here: http://sites.ninemsn.com.au/minisite/testaustralia/