RE: slavery, polygamy

"Sofia Memon" <[email protected]> Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:20:04 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.culture.religion.muslim.progressive
Organization cls
Message-ID <001301c4079d$db9743c0$6d01a8c0@SMemon>
Wasalaam Mudhillun,

Are you asking whether people are approving of and defending polygamy
and slavery (being apologists?  Or whether people want to abort these
practices from the tradition?

No one seems to be defending these parts of the tradition, so I assume
you mean the latter.  I think there is a Qur'anic basis for avoiding
both of these practices.  And while I don't necessarily feel that
polygamy is essentially bad, I think the Qur'anic warning about equal
treatment is an indication that the lousy, sexist models of polyandry
I've seen are forbidden.

Sofia

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 12:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Progressivemuslimsnetwork] slavery, polygamy


Salaams folks,

Is there anyone else here who feels like this discussion about slavery
and 
polygamy (polygyny, not to be confused w/polyandry) is laden with an 
apologist tenor/tone?

Maybe I don't understand what that means, "apologist", so hopefully
someone 
can clarify for me?

I just remember in an Arabic culture class, when the subject came up
that 
people really didn't want to touch it. My teacher's assistant didn't
even 
accept the assignment I'd written about it (pasted below an early
reading 
response on the same issue).

That was a disorienting experience in our academic community considering

that most other things were on the table if memory serves me plus I had 
personal experience, two moms when I was very young (the laws haven't 
changed . . . I assume folks knew I'd meant with a dad as well, LOL!)

Anywho, if someone can provide clarity on that tone I'm percieveing, I'm

sure it would be pleasing to Allah.

Mudhillun




Title:  01. Stereotyping of Arabs
Updated:  Sunday, 1/14/2001 6:22 PM
Due:   01/15/2001

REACTION ESSAY (approx. 250 words)

QUESTION: Before consulting the resources offered on this site for week
1, 
picture an Arab today. Try to be unbiased by your own heritage. Think of

people from different classes, women, men, children, old, young, etc.
After 
having done the readings think about what was your most striking 
misconception, or what was most surprising about what you learned from
the 
material?

I would say that I don't have a STRIKING misconception! Growing up black
in 
America [. . .]

Side Bar: Something that I also found interesting was the judgmental 
references to polgamy. Again, it was portrayed as a taboo practiced only
by 
the fringe, the (Western) assumption being that it is inherintly wrong. 
Coming from a home where polygamy was practiced, I take issue with this.
I 
thought that America had religious freedoms written into its
constitution! 
Now, I understand that even religion can not be a justification for
actions 
that cause harm. However, I don't see the harm caused when consenting 
adults form such bonds. I enjoy my family with its ups, downs, and 
complications and I feel that the reaction against many practices are 
merely toward non-western and non-traditional thinking as opposed to
real 
threats.




Mudhillun MuQaribu
Arabic 331, MW 3-5
January 22, 2001

Paper #1

Polygamy, Polygyny, Polyandry, Bigamy, Adultery? What do these terms
mean? 
Is there are distinctions? What is their status in the United States?
The 
answers depend on whom you ask; but they reveal much of our notions of 
marriage within a larger cultural context. Overall, the prevailing
United 
States view is biased against groups that even entertain or condone such

practices.

First of all, we must define marriage. In the United States, marriage is
a 
contract between a man and a woman for special kind of social and legal 
dependence for the purpose of founding and maintaining a family. This 
definition has recently come under fire because of its exclusion of 
homosexual forms of relationships but for better or worse, it is what
the 
law and religions sanction as worthy of the benefits of the state and by

extension other entities in our society.

Of the terms, each has a different meaning and while linked by the idea
of 
having more than one partner, they have greatly varying shades of
meaning. 
First off is Polygamy, which just refers to having more than one mate at

the same time. It is used as a scientific classification for humans and 
other animals and is neutral in connotation. Related terms include 
Polyandry (where a female has more than one mate at a time) and Polygyny

(where the male has more than one mate).

The remaining terms, Bigamy and Adultery are legal terms.  They refer to

relations that transgress the statute of marriage, bigamy being the 
entrance into a marriage contact while still bound in a previous one and

adultery being sexual relations between two people who are not married
to 
each other, one or both being married to others.

The American notion of marriage comes from Christian theological
teaching. 
Its sanctity was further codified when Martin Luther split with the 
Catholic Church; but curiously he was amenable to polygyny. Throughout 
history in Western society, polygamy has had an association with the 
practices of “barbarians” and “savages”. It is often regarded as sexist
and 
degrading. However, many religions (including some forms of
Christianity) 
recognized it as a legitimate social unit. Two examples include
Mormonism 
and Islam.

Mormons are a group of Christians that find their grounding in
scriptures 
revealed to their leader, Joseph Smith during a period of intense 
revivalism in the US around 1827. Basic tenets of the religion are the 
preexistence of souls waiting to be realized, belief that God evolved
from 
man, that human actions determine their future, and that the Trinity are

distinct beings. Amongst their characteristic practices is polygyny. It 
currently is outlawed but this practice as well as the economic
influence 
that the Mormon movement garnered before the turn of the century
threatened 
to undue the group as the larger society considered them a threat to
norms 
of family. In fact, the federal government and the church outlawed the 
practice before Utah (where the Mormons settled after several
persecutions) 
was recognized as a state in 1896.

In their earlier conception of marriage, it was considered lawful for a
man 
to marry more than one wife. Some found function in its raising numbers
of 
the faithful, others saw it as a way of providing resources that all
women 
may fulfill the natural function of motherhood. And some even induced it
as 
a way to salvation. When the practice was finally outlawed, not even the

argument of religious freedom could withstand our stringent concept of 
marriage and by inference, the family.

Islam is the other example where polygyny is practiced. The faith sprang

from Arabian Desert sands when Muhammad was revealed the Qur’an in
around 
622 CE. The five basic ideals are that of professed faith, regular
prayer 
and charity, as well as fasting, and pilgrimage. Adherents consider 
Muhammad and the Qur’an as the last of God’s signs and all Muslims to be
of 
one community.

In its consideration of polygyny, Islam recognized a traditional
practice, 
as well as its benefit amongst widows and orphans in a community and
limits 
it to a maximum of four equal co wives. Some people regard it also as a
way 
of celebrating marriage and procreation.

There are distinctions between the two; but they are difficult to see
when 
one lumps them together right along with forms of breach of contract 
(bigamy and adultery). This grouping is very common. Furthermore, a 
judgment of sexism is supported when the consideration of a woman’s
rights 
are not included in defining the different situations. Even today,
Mormons, 
Muslims, and other groups associated with polygyny are judged based on
this 
characteristic.  In American law, because the definition of marriage is
so 
narrow, there’s no different between any of the five terms. And being
that 
the legal definition comes from Christian doctrine, its no surprise that

the law seems biased.




_______________________________________________
ProgressiveMuslims mailing list
[email protected]
http://willo.nitric.co.za/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progressivemuslims