That sex stuff again
"talib ul-Haq" <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:55:13 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.religion.muslim.progressive |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Salaams Yameen and all others who have responded to this thread: Not sure where the suspicions come from about this thread but there is no hidden agenda. Let me say where I am coming from: Saying no to sexual intercourse outside marriage is the major plank of the entire religious sector - virtually across the spectrum. When one works with Muslims on awareness-raising on HIV/AIDS then this seem to be a basic premise that must be stated. (nothwithstanding opening the question of condoms usage and even its permissability - but that is not the issue) Second, the sexual act is often assumed to be vested with some kind of sanctity in Islam. If it is then, besides the inherent value of this notion, it is also a very useful argument to make in prevention strategies and in behaviour modification arguments. Yet, while I am desperate to make this argument, I am struggling with the notion of the sanctity of sex in Islam as is problematized in the issues that I raised, sex with slaves, muta'ah/sigheh, four wives and speedy divorces. My problem with some of the responses, perhaps part of larger difficulty with Muslim apologetics, is that we seem to think that we can change the text sheer dint of our moral convictions: For example someone wrote not sure if it was you: >>>1. A muslim is never allowed to be unfaithful. You are NOT allowed to >>>have sex with slaves as if they're objects.<<< Now the Quran and all the classical Islamic legal texts are very clear about its permissibility I do not understand that several of the responses to my mail have challenged the basic premise of my arguments of say slave ownership and polygamy and cited scholars such as Barlas. My difficulty, and perhaps it is the arrogance of my background in classical Islamic scholarship is that so much of the liberal interpretations however desperate I may be for them - are not rooted in the classical texts or based on scholarship which display a familiarity with Arabic. There is just so much of raw liberal / modernist opinion insisting on nearly imposing itself on the Quran, not because of the Quran but despite it. Anyway, perhaps it is time for me to back off. Salaams to everyone Talib _________________________________________________________________ The ultimate South African search engine at your service! http://search.msn.co.za
(unnamed)
(message/rfc822, 3.6 KB) - not displayed