CryoNet #32403

CryoNet <[email protected]> 21 Feb 2010 10:00:03 -0000
Newsgroups gmane.culture.science.cryogenics
Message-ID <[email protected]>
CryoNet - Sun 21 Feb 2010

    #32403: Bad publicity leads to more hostile relatives? [MARK PLUS]

Rate This Digest: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=32403%2D32403

Administrivia

To subscribe to CryoNet, send email to:
    [email protected]
with the subject line (not message _body_):
    subscribe
To unsubscribe, use the subject line:
    unsubscribe
To post a message to CryoNet, send your message to:
    [email protected]
from the same address to which you are aubscribed.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message #32403
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:32:33 -0700
Subject: Bad publicity leads to more hostile relatives?
From: MARK PLUS <[email protected]>

--0016e648f4a0ae27cc048009e868

Mary Robbins's relatives might have decided to interfere with her suspension
because they had heard the previous episodes of bad publicity regarding
Alcor, including rumors of the abuse of a frozen head. If they succeed in
preventing Robbins's suspension, while also intercepting the money she had
set aside for it, that will give other members' relatives the precedent and
incentive to try to stop their suspensions. And even if Alcor wins custody
of Robbins's body, the media might frame the story in a way sympathetic to
the relatives and derogatory to Alcor, contributing to problems down the
line with other suspensions opposed by the suspendees' family members.

What should we do to keep this from happening to potentially all of us with
living relatives?


-- 
Mark Plus
Life is short: Freeze hard!

--0016e648f4a0ae27cc048009e868

 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

[ AUTOMATICALLY SKIPPING HTML ENCODING! ] 

Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=32403

----------------------------------------------------------------------

End of CryoNet Digest
*********************