CryoNet #32593
CryoNet <[email protected]> 26 May 2010 09:00:03 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.science.cryogenics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
CryoNet - Wed 26 May 2010
#32593: Brain plastination. Free publication [Eisab]
Rate This Digest: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=32593%2D32593
Administrivia
To subscribe to CryoNet, send email to:
[email protected]
with the subject line (not message _body_):
subscribe
To unsubscribe, use the subject line:
unsubscribe
To post a message to CryoNet, send your message to:
[email protected]
from the same address to which you are aubscribed.
Send questions, comments, or feedback to [email protected]
with "CryoNet" or "cryonics" somewhere in the Subject line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message #32593
From: "Eisab" <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Subject: Brain plastination. Free publication
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:28:30 -0400
http://www.journal.plastination.org/archive/jp_vol.14.1/jp_vol.14.1_22-24.pdf
One human brain was used for this study. The brain was fixed in 5% formalin
for two months, rinced and cut in two halves on the
sagital plane. Both brain halves were sagitally sliced at a tickness of 4
mm. From each brain half we selected 8 slices and plastinated them
with P40 using different immersion and impregnation conditions. Two points
were marked on each slice and subsequently an imprint of
the slices was drawn on transparency film. After dehydration in -25 C
acetone, the slices of the left brain half were immersed at -25 C,
for two days in P40 and then impregnated for 24 hours. The slices of the
right brain half were immersed at +5 C for two days and
impregnated at room temperature at+15 C for 24 hours. All impregnated slices
were cured with UV light. The imprints of the fixed brain
slices were scanned into a computer, as well as the plastinated slices. By
using a Kontron KSA 400 v. 2.0 (ZEISS) software we calculated
the area of the plastinated brain slices as well as the area of the scanned
imprints. By comparing the obtained data we were able to
determine the shrinkage rate of the slices. The slices processed at -25 C
showed a shrinkage rate of 4.41%. In comparison the slices
immersed at +5 C and impregnated at +15 C showed a shrinkage rate of 6.96%
Rate This Message: http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/rate.cgi?msg=32593
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of CryoNet Digest
*********************