Re: Adaptations and borrowing..

You do mean people see all kinds of things that the author may or may not have intended, right?  Just because the author (claims s/he) doesn't see it or didn't mean it does NOT mean it isn't there, after all.  (I don't know this particular text; I just know that there are all kinds of things in texts that authors don't intend.)
 
And I completely share your non-love of the Oz books!  So there are two of us, after all!
 
Jeri Zulli
[email protected]
 

 
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:16:46 -0600
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [SF-LIT] Adaptations and borrowing..
To: [email protected]

I missed that bit in Mainspring. Probably because that unlike the rest of the population of the world I am not particularly a fan of the Oz stories. Lake's work is outstanding.
A friend of mine writes nautical fiction. He describes, in one book, the process of careening a ship. That is beaching it, rolling it on its side, and clearing the bottom of marine growth that impedes progress. A book reviewer wrote quite a lyrical passage about how erotic the whole thing seemed. Jim's (the author) reaction was, ahh, unprintable, but basically "what the hell?" People see all kinds of things in text that may, or may not, be there. Reader response theory at work.
charley
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Cahill, Colleen <[email protected]> wrote:
I wonder if the Fafhrd and Gray Mouser are an archtype and that’s why they keep coming to mind in other stories. Kind of a buddy book: a pair with complementary skills who go seeking adventure or treasure.  This is not quite the same as the “Group of companions”, but that is as close as I can come.  I noticed a similar effect of accidental literary reference in Jay Lake’s Mainspring, when his young female protagonist teams up with a metal man to go on a journey.  My mind was playing “Follow the Yellow Brick Road”, but Jay did tell me he had not intentionally tried for Oz reference.  My suspicion is there is plenty of this in books, which a reader might believe was put there on purpose. ColleenColleen [email protected]   From: Charley Seavey [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 11:38 AM
To: Science Fiction and Fantasy Listserv; Cahill, Colleen
Subject: Re: [SF-LIT] Adaptations and borrowing.. One of S.M. Stirling's earlier  books and some overtones of Faf and the Mouser! I cannot for the life of me remember the title. charley On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Cahill, Colleen <[email protected]> wrote:Mike,
   I just finished reading "The Godstone of Venus" in the Old Venus anthology and felt a hint of Leiber's Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser.  Was that intentional or just me?  Really a great story!

Colleen
Colleen Cahill
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Resnick [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 2:03 PM
To: Science Fiction and Fantasy Listserv; Cahill, Colleen
Subject: Re: [SF-LIT] Adaptations and borrowing..

On Tue, March 10, 2015 6:25 am, Colleen Cahill wrote:
> Charley,
>    The first two authors who jumped to my mind are Matthew Hughes
> (http://www.matthewhughes.org/) and Chris Dolley (chris-dolley.com),
> both of whom have written science fiction homages to P.D. Wodehouse's
> Bertie and Jeeve's stories. They both captured the good hearted humor
> of the original works and are quite a bit of fun.
>
>   This is just the tip of the ice burg, as I am sure most authors have
> some literary influence.
>
> Colleen
> Colleen Cahill
> [email protected]

I think we all have influences to greater or lesser extents. My "Harry the Book" stories are a homage to Damon Runyon, THE SOUL EATER was my answer to MOBY-DICK, "Mrs. Vamberry Takes a Trip" was a homage to Thorne Smith, etc.

-- Mike Resnick
 -- Charley
Desert Sailor

-- 
Charley
Desert Sailor