Query from SHERA member
Pamela Kachurin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.studies.history.slavic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > >----- >Hello Everyone. > >There are several questions that I have been puzzling over regarding the >reception of religious objects, particularly icons, in museum spaces. I >am hoping that someone might have some thoughts or know where I might look >to find research on related questions. > >I am writing a dissertation titled "Museum Practices and Notions of the >Local in a Russian Provincial City, 1898-1933," which focuses on the >museum opened in 1906 by the Vladimir Provincial Archival Commission. >The division of church antiquities was the strongest in this museum >largely due to the loan of a significant number of items from the >depository of the Brotherhood of Aleksandr Nevskii. Many of these items >were icons that had been sent by churches in the guberniia to the >Brotherhood because they were no longer being used and were believed to be >of value for archaeological or historical reasons. The depository was a >space primarily for preservation and research and the archival commission >successfully argued that the public would be better served by having the >objects readily available for viewing in a well-lit and comfortable space. > >Currently, my primary questions relate to how an Orthodox believer >visiting a museum for the first time might respond to viewing icons in a >non-church, non-domestic setting. For example, would visitors only know >not to kiss an icon if reprimanded or do you think the unusual setting >would have prevented them from approaching an icon in such a way? >Given that students of museums speak of a "museum gaze" or museums as a >way of seeing, and of museums as temples of a particular type, how might a >gaze of veneration become a secular gaze of contemplation? (For the >moment, I am assuming that a transformation of gaze eventually must take >place given the display techniques utilized, the wide variety of objects >nearby, the absence of characteristics important in a religious space, >etc.) > >Related to these questions: can an icon ever be unworthy of, or >inappropriate for, veneration? Unholy? Is there a de-sacralizing >ceremony for a religious object no longer in use or for an icon that is >damaged? If so, what is it/are they? > >I am also interested in the maintenance, and/or (re)placement, of icons >and other religious objects in churches which the Soviet authorities had >declared museums. (For the purposes of my dissertation, the church under >consideration is Uspenskii Cathedral.) Were cathedral-museums of atheism >used by believers to practice their faith despite the absence of shared >Orthodox rituals? What risks, if any, did Soviet authorities believe they >were undertaking when they placed expropriated religious items back into >their original settings? I have not come across archival sources on these >questions in relation to my region and would be interested to know if >someone else has for another case. > >Any thoughts, speculation and leads are welcome! > > >Susan > > > > >**************************************************************** >Susan N. Smith University of Washington >Doctoral Candidate Box 353560 >Department of History Seattle, WA 98195 > > [email protected]