Query: Constitutional Freedom in Film--two responses
Kenneth Nolley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.studies.media |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAA1nEoQet7CvQepiMa+2jXbAaX=4jkrt_NmnvGhxnGuaroxXfw@mail.gmail.com> |
From: Bond, Cynthia <[email protected]> As a scholar working on images of law in film, I would recommend that you start by defining what you mean by "constitutional freedom." Do you mean movies that focus on specific amendments in the bill of rights? Movies that reflect a "3 branches" government of checks and balances (e.g. "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.")? Obviously, you're going to find many movies that address, directly or indirectly, first amendment rights of free speech (e.g. "The People vs. Larry Flynt.") Other movies may more indirectly imply rights. If you're planning on using mainstream Hollywood movies (which are often probably the easiest way to reach undergrads), I would recommend extreme caution, as movies like "Amistad" and most others grossly distort the Constitution, portraying it as a freedom-loving core of America, rather than a document which protected slave ownership. I may be able to point you to some contextualizing articles for such films if you want to contact me off-list. Good luck! My recent articles are available here: http://ssrn.com/author=378742 Cynthia D. Bond Clinical Professor Lawyering Skills Program The John Marshall Law School 315 S. Plymouth Ct. Chicago, IL 60604 * * * * From: Lois Siegel <[email protected]> See his [Wiseman's] other films. He's outstanding. http://www.zipporah.com/wiseman Lois