Re: what is mise-en-scene
Kenneth Nolley <[email protected]> Mon, 20 May 2013 08:16:23 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.studies.media |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAA1nEoS33xXP5Woi9qdZKBBievtJ_agJSCkaxfa3mV_G0v8wPA@mail.gmail.com> |
From: "Roger Almendarez" <[email protected]> Hey Mike, Interesting question. I have always considered "mise-en-scene" to refer to everything "on screen." While cinematography refers to camera movement and, arguably, framing, I define "mise-en-scene" as what I see on the screen, which includes the placement of the objects in the "pre-filmic" moment and the arrangement of colors and shadows. My definition comes from my viewing of the image as a 2D-object and avoiding the impulse to see into a film as a 2d representation of a "real" 3d space. To understand the "mise-en-scene," I abstract the image to exist as colors, shapes, and shadows where I analyze the arrangement of negative to non-negative space. That is not to say that I don't also analyze the "mise-en-scene" of an image in terms of its signs via recognizable objects (e.g., a skull on a desk). "Mise-en-scene," then, has at least two levels within which to approach it: the abstract image and its more representational capacity as a container of signs. Best, Roger -- Roger F. Almendarez PhD Candidate Screen Cultures, Northwestern University -- --