Re: what is mise-en-scene

Kenneth Nolley <[email protected]> Mon, 20 May 2013 18:13:44 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.culture.studies.media
Message-ID <CAA1nEoShSF9qaoMjqteVCFmwJiJA9ax_gYB_c2wg+UQicGv2Rw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Deron Overpeck" <[email protected]>

As you seem to do, I maintain as firm lines between mise-en-scene and
cinematography, to the point that I don't consider any aspect of lighting
to be part of mise-en-scene. (Yes I recognize that lighting would be
considered part of mise-en-scene in theater, but to me this merely
demonstrates the limits of applying the a theatrical term to cinema.)

My problem with Sikov's approach is that it makes the concept of
mise-en-scene so expansive to be meaningless. I've seen other textbooks
that include sound in mise-en-scene. In these cases, it seems to me that
the definition of mise-en-scene isn't much different than the definition of
cinema.
--
Deron Overpeck

 --