Fwd: Query: Screenplays as literature?--two responses
Kenneth Nolley <[email protected]> Sat, 2 Nov 2013 21:29:27 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.culture.studies.media |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAA1nEoTRSNfP7PNMx8pT4hAnW=cNWmHnkTPn+AH7dJQBPJ2HsA@mail.gmail.com> |
From: *[email protected] <[email protected]>* < [email protected]> In Japan, film scripts (called "scenarios"["shinario"]) have long been considered literature. There, the version that is published (under the screenwriter's name) is the final version that the screenwriter considered her or his final version--not necessarily the version used for production. Multiscript collections for well-known screenwriters like Yoshikata Yoda (Kenji Mizoguchi and others) or Kaneto Shindo (writer and director, also wrote for other directors) are common. "Scripts" published in English, such as Donald Richie's published scripts for Kurosawa's films or Keiko McDonald's "screenplay" for Mizoguchi's Ugetsu, are more likely to be transcriptions of the film itself. best, Joanne Joanne Bernardi Associate Professor Japanese Studies Film and Media Studies University of Rochester Rochester, NY 14627 ********** From: *Stephen A Rust* <[email protected]> I am finding many of the responses to whether or not film scripts can count as literature quite reductive and oddly reactionary. Of course they count as literature. No, they are not the same as a film. No, they do not all read well. Yes, they are meant to be performed. But to suggest that they have no literary merit because they do not conform to our canonical expectations of what counts as literature is a circular argument. Accept them for what they are, value what students can gain from studying them in relation to the finished film, and embrace the play on language they allow us to experience. Steve Rust University of Oregon ********** From: *Frank, Michael* <[email protected]> all the many comments suggesting that screenplays are NOT literature are compelling [leo recommends them but only as a study tool to see what the director did with them, and not as a work of intrinsic interest] if that's the case then i think it important to articulate with some precision why screenplays are not lit when the text of stage plays are of course paul, who insists that stage plays too - including those by will S. - should not be read or taught as lit, is free from the question . . . but the rest of us need to come up with some answers mike --