Re: Address munging

Dmitry writes:

> In the case there is no justification for a given group stored
> anywhere, could you just provide me with a table of mailing lists
> where munger is turned on — Iʼll classify them into those like
> [email protected] and those which indeed might be obfuscated
> intentionally and need to deal (someday, perhaps) with them on
> case-by-case basis.

I don't think you can conclude that a list owner is fine with no address
encryption on Gmane just because the mailing list appears with
unencrypted addresses in another archive.

If I had a mailing list that I had only agreed to have on Gmane because
address encryption was turned on, and Gmane turned it off without asking
me, I would be pissed off, and I would ask to have my mailing list
removed from Gmane entirely.


Just to be clear: I don't speak for Gmane, only for myself :-)


  Best regards,

    Adam

-- 
 "The stash is a transparent plastic box,                   Adam Sjøgren
  hidden under an old tree root, and is                [email protected]
  visible if you look from the right angel."