Re: List owners were not asked if it okay to enable address munging, were they?
Dmitry Alexandrov <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:26:10 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Adam Sjøgren <[email protected]> wrote: > Dmitry writes: >>>> that in most cases it had obviously been turned _on_ without asking or even notifying anyone in charge of the list. >>> >>> That is simply not true. >> >> Could you elaborate it, please? > > Your statement is false. > > For every subscription request that has been sent, an informational email has also been sent to the list owner Ah, sorry, I have to clarify, that that is what youʼve already cleared up in the other subthread, so here I wished you to be verbose about _asking_ rather than about informing, of course. To summarize: turning munging on was an opt-out feature, right? I have to know that in order not to mix things up when speaking with listmasters.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 247 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYIACsWIQRSX35grYEsI2F1K7TIsPhUjufz5wUCXunTog0cZGFnQGdudWku b3JnAAoJEMiw+FSO5/PnLf8A/1EjfqHPOwn1KoJuTjQD/11u139Ko25cOiii99hX X2B8AQDF1Rcwt/KZrk852O0E8s8mVwjAKPxUBSxwYxhtC4TtCQ== =ZUhH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----