Re: 2 UI comments on the Alpha Sneak Preview
Christian Stocker <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:49:52 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.bitflux.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/24/03 12:50 PM, Brian King wrote: > FYI ... > >> - XUL within XHTML doesn't work properly. Or better said, _I_ couldn't >> make it work properly ;) One of the main ideas of BXE was and still is >> to provide easy integration in existing projects/CMS/you-name-it. And >> therefore it has to work with simple HTML documents. It's too much >> pain to have the implementators force to deliver XUL, IMHO. > > > Are BXE loaded documents XML or XHTML? (X)HTML, doesn't matter right now, if with X or without ;) > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183641 > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70049 > >> - remote xul is also one of those not much used features out there. >> You get a lot of tutorials/help etc, if you serve XUL from your chrome >> directory, but leaving that, you're mostly on you own (maybe that >> improved). Furthermore you have a lot of security restrictions if you >> serve XUL remotely. This is another goal of BXE: It should work >> remotely, meaning you don't have to install anything to get it work >> (this will change a little in the future, if you want some of the more >> advanced stuff, which you only can make work, if it's installed >> locally, like really-native-clipboard access, saving to local files, >> etc..) > > > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133695 > > More details for the interested here: > http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/mozilla/2002/12/17/app_dev.html > http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/mozilla/2003/05/02/casestudy2.html ah, cool, thanks for those links, will have to look deeper into it later. > >> Having said that, i'd like to point out, that there are >> implementations for mozile, which use XUL, and AFAIK the xpi version >> of mozile does have a seperate tool bar as well. > > > I have not looked at mozile, but their XPI must be installing the > toolbar into chrome. This would be one option for BXE ... though would > not be cross-browser. You could have an optional XUL toolbar, but this > would mean maintaining 2 toolbars, the HTML one and this one. Yep, the idea of the new BXE was always, that it's possible to change the widget-system and that you can have different ones. Was just not my priority to actually test, if it works ;) chregu > -- christian stocker | Bitflux GmbH | schoeneggstrasse 5 | ch-8004 zurich phone +41 1 240 56 70 | mobile +41 76 561 88 60 | fax +41 1 240 56 71 http://www.bitflux.ch | [email protected] | gnupg-keyid 0x5CE1DECB -- bx-editor-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.bitflux.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/bx-editor-dev