AW: Basic misunderstanding

"Roger Fischer" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.editors.bitflux.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>Sorry not to be clear, let me try again.
>
>I have a DTD which describes a document type. For example, we will call the
>document type "issues". I would like to create a new XML document which
>conforms to this type "issues". I intend to use this document with some
>program, so I don't care what it looks like. A basic element tree would be
>fine.
>
>The way I understand the config.xml file, I must create this new XML
>document *before* I can edit it. Since this is crazy, I must be missing
>something.

Basically you just want to edit your XML file and have a DTD to validate it,
right?
Then I think the Bitflux Editor is not the right choice at the moment.

The Bitflux Editor has just a bit another approach:
He isn't intended for the hardcore XML geek, but rather for people who would
be scared by XML.
That's why he serves them what they'll finally get on their webpage - that's
the Wysiwyg approach - and not the bare code.
We then can still reuse the XML to make PDFs, Word RTF, Postscript, SVG...
whatever.

If you want to have a simple editor - you better use our CMS;), without the
Wysiwyg Editor.

But, fun aside, it is possible that we add such a simple edit capability in
the Wysiwyg Editor later on as well. Depends a bit on the demand;)

Best
Roger





-- 
bx-editor-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.bitflux.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/bx-editor-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.