Re: Small problem when building documentation with fo disabled

On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 12:42:19PM +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote:
> Le 24 oct. 2004, à 11:41, Geert Stappers a écrit :
> >On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:41:58AM +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote:
  <snip/>
> >>There are warnings for all fo_xxx, should not be a conditional here to
> >>build or not with libfo, but still have the whole documentation built
> >>(in case gtk-doc is enabled)?
> >
> >IIRC fo_xxx were recently dropped.
> >If so: drop fo_xxx from the gtk-doc definition files.
> OK, I'll do it, I was not sure, it has to be done.
> 
> >
> >>Michèle
> >><http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>
> >
> >Geert Stappers
> >(sorry for not build gtk-doc the last month)
> Don't worry I built it every day there is a change, so I'll see if 
> something changes.

Let us know when you need upstream changes.

> Michèle
> <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>

Geert Stappers

_______________________________________________
Conglomerate-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.copyleft.no/mailman/listinfo/conglomerate-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBfT56OSINbgwa/7sRAgi9AKCL4fyBtWlkf0XlTl8JZSX/oaR19gCfb/SW
s3d5ZWgYBaqgqsCtqeAQYYs=
=S114
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----