Re: Small problem when building documentation with fo disabled

Le 25 oct. 2004, à 19:57, Geert Stappers a écrit :

> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 12:42:19PM +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote:
>> Le 24 oct. 2004, à 11:41, Geert Stappers a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:41:58AM +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote:
>   <snip/>
>>>> There are warnings for all fo_xxx, should not be a conditional here 
>>>> to
>>>> build or not with libfo, but still have the whole documentation 
>>>> built
>>>> (in case gtk-doc is enabled)?
>>>
>>> IIRC fo_xxx were recently dropped.
>>> If so: drop fo_xxx from the gtk-doc definition files.
>> OK, I'll do it, I was not sure, it has to be done.
>>
>>>
>>>> Michèle
>>>> <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>
>>>
>>> Geert Stappers
>>> (sorry for not build gtk-doc the last month)
>> Don't worry I built it every day there is a change, so I'll see if
>> something changes.
>
> Let us know when you need upstream changes.
Oh, yes, of course, as usual.

For the moment, I wait for the committing of fr.po as I sent it, then I 
will rebuild and tell you if something is wrong or what needs to be 
changed regarding the doc. And finally I will send a new fr.po once the 
first one (with no patch at all) would have reached anonymous cvs.

Michèle
<http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>

_______________________________________________
Conglomerate-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.copyleft.no/mailman/listinfo/conglomerate-devel