Re: Validation of new document based on cnxml
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) Fri, 6 May 2005 22:42:49 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.conglomerate.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:41:07PM +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote: > Le 6 mai 2005 à 01:40, David Malcolm a écrit : > >On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 16:56 +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote: <snip/> > >(Coming back months later) > >Did any of this make it into CVS (or bugzilla)? > No you rejected the patch as you wanted that someone from the cnxml > team confirmed it. What was the response the cnxml team? Cheers Geert Stappers Who thinks that 'this is an approvement to me' is better then a never "offical" approved patch. _______________________________________________ Conglomerate-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.copyleft.no/mailman/listinfo/conglomerate-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCe9bJOSINbgwa/7sRAuw9AKCJzgMSDSjnzQLuS219syrrGvR1FwCghJ8b s8p+oDWToOPi2qkw/L6pleY= =z3JY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----