Re: faq.xml.qna, yelp doesn't handle QandA

Le 9 mai 2005 à 19:46, Sean Wheller a écrit :

> On Monday 09 May 2005 19:53, Michèle Garoche wrote:
>
>> If you transform the faq, which is a rather short file, comparing to
>> the remaining doc, you'll put a severe load on the required
>> dependancies: docbook and the like.
>>
>
> Hence I say that the faq should not be packaged. It is really a web  
> site
> thing. I have no idea why this project amongst many is one of the  
> only one to
> ship a faq. Put it on the web site and lets be done with this  
> already. I am
> getting tired of going in square circles.
I agree till the beginning. The point was if the faq is packaged,  
then it should exist a possibility to view it on all systems.

If not packaged, which is the best solution, then should not the  
files be moved away from the tree or at least not be packed with the  
tarball? And on the web site should not a clear link to the faq be  
put? Because at the moment, it's not obvious to find it (in getting  
involved is not the most obvious place for me to find it, I would  
have rather search in docs or even better in a standalone new part:  
something like intro : docs : faq : getting... at the right top of  
the page).

Cheers,
Michèle
<http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>