Re: faq.xml.qna, yelp doesn't handle QandA

On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 06:10 +0200, Michèle Garoche wrote:
> Le 9 mai 2005 à 19:46, Sean Wheller a écrit :
> 
> > On Monday 09 May 2005 19:53, Michèle Garoche wrote:
> >
> >> If you transform the faq, which is a rather short file, comparing to
> >> the remaining doc, you'll put a severe load on the required
> >> dependancies: docbook and the like.
> >>
> >
> > Hence I say that the faq should not be packaged. It is really a web  
> > site
> > thing. I have no idea why this project amongst many is one of the  
> > only one to
> > ship a faq. Put it on the web site and lets be done with this  
> > already. I am
> > getting tired of going in square circles.
> I agree till the beginning. The point was if the faq is packaged,  
> then it should exist a possibility to view it on all systems.
> 
> If not packaged, which is the best solution, then should not the  
> files be moved away from the tree or at least not be packed with the  
> tarball? And on the web site should not a clear link to the faq be  
> put? Because at the moment, it's not obvious to find it (in getting  
> involved is not the most obvious place for me to find it, I would  
> have rather search in docs or even better in a standalone new part:  
> something like intro : docs : faq : getting... at the right top of  
> the page).

Good idea (putting the FAQ as a toplevel item in the website).  

Please file a bug report against conglomerate; component: website.

Dave