I will answer questions asked to me

Since I still do not know how to use the mailing list, I answer in this way.
I may not be able to read English messages very properly, but I will reply
as much as possible.
I think the following items will be the answer.

* What I think about jEdit
** I want jEdit to be something like IntelliJ IDEA Community Edition.
   However, I think that there is something wrong and it is not.
   I want to solve that problem.
* About the repository I created
** This project aims to create a text editor that follows jEdit.
** I think that the results obtained in that process can also be returned
to the jEdit project
* About IntelliJ
** Java requires an IDE like IntelliJ. As jEdit is.
https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/svn/14193/
** And there is much to learn by using IntelliJ.
https://twitter.com/slava_pestov/status/702018397924536320
* About Steve Jakob
** He changed my negative perception of me and made it public. So I have no
hostility towards him anymore and will not attack him.
** Also, I think that the claim is generally valid about my disrespectful
he says.
   So, I apologize to those who are offended by that. I'm sorry.
*** However, "old" and "poor" do not think that I have the same meaning.
* About the license
** Linux is successful under GPL2. It is supported by many Linux
distributions, which are supported by many non-GPL2 licensed software.
** When I talk about licensing, at least when I talk about GPL2, I write it
as GPL2 and I understand that it is better not to write only GPL, so I will
be careful in the future.
** And there is a strong point that it means that jEdit's plugin manager
should not show the license as it is a serious misunderstanding and should
be improved.
* Relationship between OSS and companies
** Many OSSs are now supported by companies.
** For example, IntelliJ IDEA Communitiy Edition is supported by JetBrains.
** For example, OpenJDK is supported by Oracle.
*** The OpenJDK is a good example of a successful GPL when it comes to
licensing.
    However, it is GNU Classpath Exception. In my recognition this is
different from GPL2. Naturally recognition will differ depending on the
person.
* About GitHub
** It takes experiments that sometimes fail to develop something, GitHub is
excellent as a test site.

After reading various opinions and organizing the situation, I changed my
perception of the past and came up with an idea, so I will propose it.
How about creating a repository on GitHub to experiment with jEdit?
Under a permissive license, put experimental code there to make jEdit
better, but without confirmation.
As I do now, just throwing in ideas can be helpful.
And it will promote jEdit's development under GPL2 and prove that GPL2 is
not a bad license.
In any case, it is better to have an account in the name of jedit.org, and
I think that there are no disadvantages.

I now think that I can use Apache Ivy for the plugin management system, and
I want to make the code as soon as possible.
However, I can not say that this week or this month.
And, I have the confidence to trigger my plan to be adopted.

PS.
If you are concerned about "my dark summons", ask me personally, I will
answer.
However, needless to say, I do not take any responsibility for "anything"
that happens to you.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------
jEdit Users' List
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-users