Re: Problem with installation on Windows 10

Jesse Lackey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.editors.jedit.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all, I got two helpful messages (I'm unclear if they went to everyone 
or just me), and I'm up and running!  For anyone searching for a 
solution to this, I've copied the messages below.

I did what Chris did, and run version 5.5, instead of the latest 5.6. 
Works just fine and I didn't need to do the font scaling (my monitor is 
a 30" 1600 vertical, so it isn't in the realm of the tiny pixel 4K 
ones).  I feel a little dumb that I didn't think to just try an earlier 
version of jedit.

Jana1972 wrote that installing Java 11 solved it, in that he/she (and I) 
have an earlier version of Java installed.  Frankly I thought I was 
using the latest and rechecked and I'm still confused and I didn't feel 
like fiddling further.

So now I have my fave little look at code / log files / gcode / mystery 
file editor again :)

Thanks all!
J



> Hi, Jesse,
> 
> Not sure if this will help you along, but I am using...
> 
> java version "1.8.0_91"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_91-b15)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 25.91-b15, mixed mode, sharing)
> 
> ...with jEdit 5.5 on Windows10 and it works fine. The only snafu I hit was a need to disable display scaling--until I did that, the fonts were impossibly small to read. Here is how to manage that...
> 
> https://superuser.com/questions/1173048/some-applications-fonts-are-too-small
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> Regards,
> -Chris


 > from jana1972:
> Hi
> After installing  Java 11, JEdit 5.6 started  to work for me.
> My problem was in a lower version of Java
> 










Jesse Lackey wrote:
> Hi all, I just got the very latest Win10 on my development system 
> (goodbye win7! it was good..) and surprisingly of all the dev software I 
> use, jEdit has been the hardest to get going in Win10.
> 
> I have *exactly* the problem that jana1972 has.  I have that version of 
> java (verified with "java -version"), I'm trying to use jEdit 5.6, and I 
> always get the same Java Runtime Environment 11 required message.
> 
> I'm fully stuck, I've installed several versions (?) of Java, which I 
> know zero about, and no go.
> 
> I really hate to give up on jEdit, I've used it now and then for 15 years.
> 
> Can anyone help with a step by step for me?
> (and may I suggest ... that a step by step be in a FAQ or on the main 
> download page, since an install on a clean Win10 should be 
> straightforward ...)
> 
> Thanks in advance - missing it!
> J
> 
> 
>> Which version of jEdit?
>>
>> Java Runtime version 1.6 (aka Java 6) or later is required for jEdit 4.4
>> and later.
>> Java Runtime version 1.7 (aka Java 7) or later is required for jEdit 5.2
>> and later.
>> Java Runtime version 1.8 (aka Java 8) or later is required for jEdit 5.4
>> and later.
>> Java Runtime version 11 (aka Java 11) or later is required for jEdit 5.6
>> and later.
>>
>> http://jedit.org/index.php?page=download
>>
>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 4:11 AM jana1972 <jana1972@...> wrote:
>>
>>> I tried to install Jedit program but failed. It does not start but says
>>>
>>> The application requires Java Runtime Environment
>>>
>>> Yet, Java is installed. I think
>>>
>>> C:\Users\expor>java -version
>>> java version "1.8.0_291"
>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_291-b10)
>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.291-b10, mixed mode)
>>>
>>> Where is the problem?
>>> Thank you for help
>>>
>>> L
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> -----------------------------------------------
>>> jEdit Users' List
>>> jEdit-users@...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-users
>>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
-----------------------------------------------
jEdit Users' List
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.