Re: too many updates of the "outline" on branch 2.5.x

Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.editors.lyx.devel
Message-ID <adFFwAvaiQWSmxWG@jimmy>
On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 10:39:59AM +0100, Julien SCORDIA via lyx-devel wrote:
> Hello LyX developers,

Hi Julien, sorry for the late reply!

> I have recently upgraded from LyX 2.3.2 to the 2.5.x branch.
> 
> I find that on a simple LyX document with a section and subsection,
> 
> 
>            1 foo
> 
> 
>              1.1 bar
> 
>        bar1
>        bar2
>        bar3
> 
> When putting the cursor after bar2 and typing on the return key, the outline is updated. Why? Right now I cannot try in 2.3.2, but it seems to me it was not the case.

I don't know. I do know that there are a lot of outliner updates that seem unnecessary but it's just complicated to fix it.

If curious, you can see a mailing list thread about a recent regression on outliner updates here:

  https://lists.lyx.org/pipermail/lyx-devel/2025-October/015556.html

I don't imagine it's related to your issue, but mention it just in case.

> On a large file I am working on, I obtain some LyX crashes (without precise scenario, unfortunately), and I suspect that these frequent outline updates are linked to that.

I don't have good intuition here, but it would surprise me if the crash
is due to the frequent outline updates. In my experience, a crash
sometimes happens because there aren't enough updates (other kinds of
updates though, such as refreshing cached values). Just a guess though.

It would be great to figure out a recipe for what causes your crash.

> To avoid these updates, it is enough to simply return  before updateViewNow() in GuiToc.cpp:
> 
>        void GuiToc::enableView(bool enable)
>        {
>             if (!enable)
>                 // In the opposite case, updateView() will be called anyway.
>                 return;
>                 widget_->updateViewNow();
>        }
> 
> I have not been able to find which method is calling enableView() again and again.
> 
> Am I right that there is a problem to solve here?

Yes. My guess is that the problem is just quite complicated.

Scott

-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEMfkICpsJzYuNuGlOA4ZnarZHC+sFAmnRR2YACgkQA4ZnarZH
C+uOcggAjgkb7VbNYloYRD0B2YmLhurJytsd+uxvLe/KlC+EwrCuBbcIWXzMq65b
VWhXvdR1Buez4yDzyfDXSL0KWlghH7VBIkC3y0d+ruEFZDc01AsKcC5Nn9R+lGs4
S7xnh/0/YSz54WBHtA34OIo1jpBDpJOrJ3dec8AB0iUWTbOHISUPccvkO0EzklLc
/oQ3j2Bw2sXsLmxMiMAd4gCsT9Il/DJEA/YFZQUw3punFBUXUIgPmsf91lrCvro8
oGKI6VaROD05V5eh1ng8o5AE1x4KcD1T/DHFwy5VoQtlRRSC8IskGJHlGUALvfYc
glp3JgklIch7iO8a7LEWYzw40E3Xpg==
=iT1b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.