Re: Review Request: Use blanks, escaped char, inline comment and number to simplify code

> Hi Darcy,
>
> First of all, a very happy new year!
>
> Thanks for your parsing patch. It seems like a good idea indeed to
> have a more systematic way to parse programming languages.
> I quickly went through your code and noticed a few things:
>
> - You often use the list<...> template when you really should be
> using the array<...> template (which is more efficient for arrays ;^)
>
> - You may simplify some lines such as
>
> + if (blanks_parser.parse (s, pos)) {
> + break;
> + }
>
> into
>
> + if (blanks_parser.parse (s, pos)) break;
>
> As a general rule, I am happy to see that you adhered quite well to
> my coding style. This makes it much easier for me to read your code ;^)


I will improve the code later.


> Do you want me to apply the patch before version 2.1, or do you prefer
> me to wait a bit? I just got good news from my employer that I will
> be allowed to auto-edit my book on TeXmacs. I still have to go through
> some legal business, but TeXmacs 2.1 is definitely approaching fast now.

Sorry, I have committed the patch.  Well, I thought I waited a week but 
did not

notice that 2020/01/01 is Wednesday.

Good news for your book on TeXmacs!

For TeXmacs 2.1, is TeXmacs 2.1 right after TeXmacs 1.99.12?

> One other thing that we have to address at a certain point is coloring 
> schemes.
> There is quite a lot of ad hoc coloring going on in TeXmacs (syntax 
> highlighting,
> but also the color of the cursor, selections, the surroundings of the 
> window, etc.).
> It would be nice to make all this stylable and make it part of the 
> infra-structure
> for themes that I have been starting to design.

Good idea!

Currently, I am still busy on improving the code base of the current 
xxx_language.cpp.

Find the common routines and do some abstractions. I submitted the issue 
for a long

time: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54888

Finally, there will be no xxx_language.cpp, we wrote the base parsers in 
cpp and combines

the parsing components in scheme. To support a new language, we only 
need to write a new

scheme file.

I have a vague roadmap in my mind, but the destination is clear.

>
> Best wishes, --Joris
>
> _______________________________________________
> Texmacs-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev



_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev