Re: trees
Julien Frontisi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.editors.texmacs.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
By nested trees, I just meant trees inside trees. That is already implemented in trees. To make them horizontal, maybe a macro like <\rotate | 90 | <\tree | <\rotate | -90 | <arg>> | … | <\rotate | -90 | <arg>> > If you do it manually it works (clumsily) but it is not easy to access the elements of the tree after building it. Julien > Le 6 oct. 2023 à 10:42, vincent douce <[email protected]> a écrit : > > yes, \tree corresponds to [mathmode]insert->tree and works very fine for « vertical » trees > > but 99% of probabitliy papers (at least in high schools) and 99% of screenshot on google image with keywords « probabillity trees » have horizontal trees, not vertical one > > i have no idea if it would be difficult for the developer team to implement it ; or maybe it is in project > > also, Julien, you say « nested trees » > do you mind nested trees exist in TeXmacs or do you suggest they would be welcome ? > > Vincent > >> Le 6 oct. 2023 à 09:01, Julien Frontisi <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >> >> In mode math, \tree works fine. Nested trees if you need more than a root and one generation of children. >> One would need some kind of matrix transposition to make it horizontal. >> Julien >> >>> Le 6 oct. 2023 à 04:41, Giovanni Piredda <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >>> >>> How do you construct the vertical tree in TeXmacs? With the current TeXmacs, I would construct either tree with a drawing. >>> >>> On 06/10/23 01:18, vincent douce wrote: >>>> hello Giovanni >>>> from TeXmacs (vertical) : <GraphiqueCollé-1.png> >>>> >>>> preferred (horizontal) : <GraphiqueCollé-2.png> >>>> >>>> when you type "tree probability » on internet you only get horizontal trees… >>>> >>>> Vincent >>>> >>>> >>>>> Le 5 oct. 2023 à 19:13, Giovanni Piredda <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >