Re: Bibliography

On 08/10/23 09:17, Nefton Pali wrote:
>
> Dear Giovanni,
>
> many thanks for your kind reply and hellp. Yes, please find enclosed 
> the .bib file that I created. It is impossible to integrate it when I 
> select on the menu File-->Import-->BibTex
>
> Best,
>
> Nefton
>
>

Dear Nefton,

the attachment you sent is an empty file. If you want, you might send it 
again to me alone (not to the whole mailing list), then I will answer 
you again through the mailing list. Said this, quoting from your message

> It is impossible to integrate it when I select on the menu 
> File-->Import-->BibTex

I think that the book on TeXmacs, the Jolly Writer, which you can find 
at https://www.scypress.com/The-Jolly-Writer.pdf, explains (in its 
section 6.5) how to use the bibliography database better than the 
manual. In particular one imports a BibTeX database through the database 
tool, and not from the File menu; one activates the database tool from 
the Tool menu (Tools -> Database tool). Could you check the book and see 
if it makes more sense for you than the manual?

On the other hand, it is also possible, and perhaps easier, to compile a 
bibliography without using the Database tool. You have to, from the 
menu, Insert -> Automatic -> Bibliography, then fill in the name of the 
bibliography file in the field that appears in the ribbon (it is easiest 
to place the bibliography file in the same directory as the TeXmacs 
file); you have also to update the bibliography information inside the 
document (I expect Document -> Update -> Bibliography to be enough, I 
used Update -> All in the test I did for writing this). The advantage of 
using the internal database is that you can search the entries from 
within TeXmacs (also explained in the Jolly Writer).


Giovanni



> Le 07/10/2023 à 10:11, Giovanni Piredda a écrit :
>>
>>
>> On 06/10/23 13:47, Nefton Pali wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> please could you send me clear instructions how to create a file 
>>> bibliography and how to integrate the bibliography. I tryed to apply 
>>> the manual quite unsuccesfully.
>>>
>> Hi Nefton,
>>
>> it would be much easier if you would write step by step what you did, 
>> maybe there are ambiguities in the manual that I did not detect and 
>> if you write what you did it makes it possible to spot what needs to 
>> be changed.
>>
>>> More over I'm not able to count the formulas relatively to each 
>>> section. For instance I want a numeration like (9.13) instead of (350).
>>>
>> That, on the opposite, I can tell you now: once that the cursor is in 
>> a display formula, you can right-click, and in the menu that opens 
>> select Preferences -> Prefix by section number; you can access the 
>> same menu, again when the cursor is in a display formula: on the 
>> lower part of the menu bar you will see the symbol of a wrench key 
>> and you need to press that.
>>
>> Pls. ask if you need more information.
>>
>> Giovanni
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Please hellp me.
>>>
>>> Nefton
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 06/10/2023 à 12:21, Julien Frontisi a écrit :
>>>> By nested trees, I just meant trees inside trees. That is already 
>>>> implemented in trees.
>>>>
>>>> To make them horizontal, maybe a macro like <\rotate | 90 | <\tree 
>>>> | <\rotate | -90 | <arg>> | … |  <\rotate | -90 | <arg>> >
>>>> If you do it manually it works (clumsily) but it is not easy to 
>>>> access the elements of the tree after building it.
>>>>
>>>> Julien
>>>>
>>>>> Le 6 oct. 2023 à 10:42, vincent douce <[email protected]> a 
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> yes, \tree corresponds to [mathmode]insert->tree and works very 
>>>>> fine for « vertical » trees
>>>>>
>>>>> but 99% of probabitliy papers (at least in high schools) and 99% 
>>>>> of screenshot on google image with keywords « probabillity trees » 
>>>>>  have horizontal trees, not vertical one
>>>>>
>>>>> i have no idea if it would be difficult for the developer team to 
>>>>> implement it ; or maybe it is in project
>>>>>
>>>>> also, Julien, you say « nested trees »
>>>>> do you mind nested trees exist in TeXmacs or do you suggest they 
>>>>> would be welcome ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Vincent
>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 6 oct. 2023 à 09:01, Julien Frontisi <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In mode math, \tree works fine. Nested trees if you need more 
>>>>>> than a root and one generation of children.
>>>>>> One would need some kind of matrix transposition to make it 
>>>>>> horizontal.
>>>>>> Julien
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le 6 oct. 2023 à 04:41, Giovanni Piredda <[email protected]> a 
>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How do you construct the vertical tree in TeXmacs? With the 
>>>>>>> current TeXmacs, I would construct either tree with a drawing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 06/10/23 01:18, vincent douce wrote:
>>>>>>>> hello Giovanni
>>>>>>>> from TeXmacs (vertical) : <GraphiqueCollé-1.png>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> preferred (horizontal) : <GraphiqueCollé-2.png>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> when you type "tree probability » on internet you only get 
>>>>>>>> horizontal trees…
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vincent
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Le 5 oct. 2023 à 19:13, Giovanni Piredda <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>