Re: Bibliography

Dear Giovanni,

many thanks for your kind reply and hellp. Yes, please find enclosed the 
.bib file that I created. It is impossible to integrate it when I select 
on the menu File-->Import-->BibTex

Best,

Nefton


Le 07/10/2023 à 10:11, Giovanni Piredda a écrit :
>
>
> On 06/10/23 13:47, Nefton Pali wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> please could you send me clear instructions how to create a file 
>> bibliography and how to integrate the bibliography. I tryed to apply 
>> the manual quite unsuccesfully.
>>
> Hi Nefton,
>
> it would be much easier if you would write step by step what you did, 
> maybe there are ambiguities in the manual that I did not detect and if 
> you write what you did it makes it possible to spot what needs to be 
> changed.
>
>> More over I'm not able to count the formulas relatively to each 
>> section. For instance I want a numeration like (9.13) instead of (350).
>>
> That, on the opposite, I can tell you now: once that the cursor is in 
> a display formula, you can right-click, and in the menu that opens 
> select Preferences -> Prefix by section number; you can access the 
> same menu, again when the cursor is in a display formula: on the lower 
> part of the menu bar you will see the symbol of a wrench key and you 
> need to press that.
>
> Pls. ask if you need more information.
>
> Giovanni
>
>
>
>
>> Please hellp me.
>>
>> Nefton
>>
>>
>> Le 06/10/2023 à 12:21, Julien Frontisi a écrit :
>>> By nested trees, I just meant trees inside trees. That is already 
>>> implemented in trees.
>>>
>>> To make them horizontal, maybe a macro like <\rotate | 90 | <\tree | 
>>> <\rotate | -90 | <arg>> | … |  <\rotate | -90 | <arg>> >
>>> If you do it manually it works (clumsily) but it is not easy to 
>>> access the elements of the tree after building it.
>>>
>>> Julien
>>>
>>>> Le 6 oct. 2023 à 10:42, vincent douce <[email protected]> a 
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>> yes, \tree corresponds to [mathmode]insert->tree and works very 
>>>> fine for « vertical » trees
>>>>
>>>> but 99% of probabitliy papers (at least in high schools) and 99% of 
>>>> screenshot on google image with keywords « probabillity trees » 
>>>>  have horizontal trees, not vertical one
>>>>
>>>> i have no idea if it would be difficult for the developer team to 
>>>> implement it ; or maybe it is in project
>>>>
>>>> also, Julien, you say « nested trees »
>>>> do you mind nested trees exist in TeXmacs or do you suggest they 
>>>> would be welcome ?
>>>>
>>>> Vincent
>>>>
>>>>> Le 6 oct. 2023 à 09:01, Julien Frontisi <[email protected]> 
>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> In mode math, \tree works fine. Nested trees if you need more than 
>>>>> a root and one generation of children.
>>>>> One would need some kind of matrix transposition to make it 
>>>>> horizontal.
>>>>> Julien
>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 6 oct. 2023 à 04:41, Giovanni Piredda <[email protected]> a 
>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do you construct the vertical tree in TeXmacs? With the 
>>>>>> current TeXmacs, I would construct either tree with a drawing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/10/23 01:18, vincent douce wrote:
>>>>>>> hello Giovanni
>>>>>>> from TeXmacs (vertical) : <GraphiqueCollé-1.png>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> preferred (horizontal) : <GraphiqueCollé-2.png>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> when you type "tree probability » on internet you only get 
>>>>>>> horizontal trees…
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vincent
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le 5 oct. 2023 à 19:13, Giovanni Piredda <[email protected]> a 
>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>