Re: Bibliography

On 06/10/23 13:47, Nefton Pali wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> please could you send me clear instructions how to create a file 
> bibliography and how to integrate the bibliography. I tryed to apply 
> the manual quite unsuccesfully.
>
Hi Nefton,

it would be much easier if you would write step by step what you did, 
maybe there are ambiguities in the manual that I did not detect and if 
you write what you did it makes it possible to spot what needs to be 
changed.

> More over I'm not able to count the formulas relatively to each 
> section. For instance I want a numeration like (9.13) instead of (350).
>
That, on the opposite, I can tell you now: once that the cursor is in a 
display formula, you can right-click, and in the menu that opens select 
Preferences -> Prefix by section number; you can access the same menu, 
again when the cursor is in a display formula: on the lower part of the 
menu bar you will see the symbol of a wrench key and you need to press that.

Pls. ask if you need more information.

Giovanni




> Please hellp me.
>
> Nefton
>
>
> Le 06/10/2023 à 12:21, Julien Frontisi a écrit :
>> By nested trees, I just meant trees inside trees. That is already 
>> implemented in trees.
>>
>> To make them horizontal, maybe a macro like <\rotate | 90 | <\tree | 
>> <\rotate | -90 | <arg>> | … |  <\rotate | -90 | <arg>> >
>> If you do it manually it works (clumsily) but it is not easy to 
>> access the elements of the tree after building it.
>>
>> Julien
>>
>>> Le 6 oct. 2023 à 10:42, vincent douce <[email protected]> a 
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>> yes, \tree corresponds to [mathmode]insert->tree and works very fine 
>>> for « vertical » trees
>>>
>>> but 99% of probabitliy papers (at least in high schools) and 99% of 
>>> screenshot on google image with keywords « probabillity trees » 
>>>  have horizontal trees, not vertical one
>>>
>>> i have no idea if it would be difficult for the developer team to 
>>> implement it ; or maybe it is in project
>>>
>>> also, Julien, you say « nested trees »
>>> do you mind nested trees exist in TeXmacs or do you suggest they 
>>> would be welcome ?
>>>
>>> Vincent
>>>
>>>> Le 6 oct. 2023 à 09:01, Julien Frontisi <[email protected]> a 
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>> In mode math, \tree works fine. Nested trees if you need more than 
>>>> a root and one generation of children.
>>>> One would need some kind of matrix transposition to make it horizontal.
>>>> Julien
>>>>
>>>>> Le 6 oct. 2023 à 04:41, Giovanni Piredda <[email protected]> a 
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> How do you construct the vertical tree in TeXmacs? With the 
>>>>> current TeXmacs, I would construct either tree with a drawing.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/10/23 01:18, vincent douce wrote:
>>>>>> hello Giovanni
>>>>>> from TeXmacs (vertical) : <GraphiqueCollé-1.png>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> preferred (horizontal) : <GraphiqueCollé-2.png>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> when you type "tree probability » on internet you only get 
>>>>>> horizontal trees…
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vincent
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le 5 oct. 2023 à 19:13, Giovanni Piredda <[email protected]> a 
>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>