Re: Yvon Garlan on military architecture
Laval Hunsucker <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Nov 2019 18:56:42 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.education.classics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAB+NcSF4ndBxe7axLk4O2Xex+FVwXeaRssfg-VHmQduDor28SQ@mail.gmail.com> |
> . . . as he concludes that fortifications are not merely "economic" but > promote the *épanouissement*, "blooming," of democracy and "civic > forces." One of several brilliant pieces. . . Interesting, but makes me immediately and ineluctably wonder what, say, the Marquis de Vauban, for example, might have thought or said of such a line of reasoning . - Laval Hunsucker Brœuquelenne-les-deux-églises, Pays-Bas On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 4:21 PM DANIEL P. Tompkins <[email protected]> wrote: In the wonderful volume *Problèmes de la guerre en Grèce ancienne*, ed. > Vernant (1968), Garlan opens his essay on "fortifications" with the > remark, “military architecture is often treated in archaeology like a poor > relative” ("l'architecture militaire a été souvent considérée comme une > parente pauvre..."). He goes on to use Plato and Aristotle as he concludes > that fortifications are not merely "economic" but promote the > *épanouissement*, "blooming," of democracy and "civic forces." One of > several brilliant pieces in a book that has more to say about sociology of > ancient warfare than many more recent ones. > > Dan >