Re: Great thinkers and weaponry
"DANIEL P. Tompkins" <[email protected]> Sun, 24 Nov 2019 13:32:19 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.education.classics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALDHrcZSjbv+CxeFnC0J8aA5b8x16Gg3hvWFTBqODj8WPEhQUg@mail.gmail.com> |
Brilliant, must add to my list Thx, Dan On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 1:30 PM Szegedy-Maszak, Andrew < [email protected]> wrote: > Great quotation. I'm put in mind of Thales, who speculated about the basi= c > substance of the cosmos, and is also said to have predicted an eclipse, a= nd > to have engineered the diversion of the River Halys so that the army of > Croesus could cross it. Which didn't turn out so well for Croesus, of > course. > > > Andrew Szegedy-Maszak > Professor of Classical Studies > Jane A. Seney Professor of Greek > Wesleyan University > Middletown, CT 06459 > ph: 860.685.2065 > fax: 860.685.2089 > ________________________________ > From: Classical Greek and Latin Discussion Group <[email protected]> > on behalf of DANIEL P. Tompkins <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2019 1:12 PM > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: [CLASSICS-L] Great thinkers and weaponry > > We're trained to a degree to think of earlier thinkers as specialists in > the useless and ethereal -- "values," "morality," "beauty": "The Good," a= s > one line of scholars has it. > > So it's worthwhile to note that these dudes also, often, understood > weaponry. Leonardo da Vinci's famous job application letter > < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.b= usinessinsider.com%2Fleonardo-da-vinci-cover-letter-from-1400s-2014-6&d= ata=3D02%7C01%7CCLASSICS-L%40lsv.uky.edu%7C2c7b3a18c3fb40fb1ce108d7710cabb5= %7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C637102171544769396&sdata= =3DWdfl2zrIAR0LD1LmOE5%2Bg4eoLGEMs0wgLtIq93fHyYM%3D&reserved=3D0 > '> > to Ludovico Sforza in Milan omitted *La Gioconda* and hit on the items of > more value to Ludovico: > > I have also types of cannon, most convenient and easily portable, with > which to hurl small stones almost like a hail-storm; and the smoke from t= he > cannon will instil a great fear in the enemy on account of the grave dama= ge > and confusion. > Also, I have means of arriving at a designated spot through mines and > secret winding passages constructed completely without noise, even if it > should be necessary to pass underneath moats or any river. > Also, I will make covered vehicles, safe and unassailable, which will > penetrate the enemy and their artillery, and there is no host of armed me= n > so great that they would not break through it. And behind these the > infantry will be able to follow, quite uninjured and unimpeded.... etc. > etc. > > It does seem worthwhile to scope out an employer's interests in advance. > > That occurred to me when I notice this in Aristotle's *Politics *(1330-31= , > abridged, from the Perseus > < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.pe= rseus.tufts.edu%2Fhopper%2Ftext%3Fdoc%3DPerseus%253atext%253a1999.01.0057&a= mp;data=3D02%7C01%7CCLASSICS-L%40lsv.uky.edu%7C2c7b3a18c3fb40fb1ce108d7710c= abb5%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C637102171544769396&sd= ata=3D5L%2Bp5RZR4FlS%2BGZGCmFyB42rACJZfYNL%2BWjnBQzsOIY%3D&reserved=3D0 > > > site): > > Against an evenly matched foe it is not honorable [really, "not Good," as > above: =CE=BF=CF=85 =CE=BA=CE=B1=CE=BB=CF=8C=CE=BD] to try to secure ones= elf by the strength of one's > fortifications; but as it does and may happen that the superior numbers o= f > the attackers may be too much for the human valor of a small force, if th= e > city is to survive and not to suffer disaster or insult [=CF=80=CE=AC=CF= =83=CF=87=CE=B5=CE=B9=CE=BD =CE=BA=CE=B1=CE=BA=E1=BF=B6=CF=82 =CE=BC=CE=B7= =CE=B4=E1=BD=B2 > =E1=BD=91=CE=B2=CF=81=CE=AF=CE=B6=CE=B5=CF=83=CE=B8=CE=B1=CE=B9], the sec= urest fortification of walls must be deemed to be the > most warlike, particularly in view of the* inventions that have now been= * > *made in the direction of precision with missiles and artillery for > sieges*. > > > In both cases, the "thinkers" have thought about how to win and /or > survive. There must be others. Values are one thing, staying alive is > another. > > There is a tendency in classical scholarship (e.g. Thucydides) to transla= te > "good" as "honorable." This leads, occasionally, to disasters. > > Dan >