JOB- Central Asia & Caucasus Research Project, Freie Univ. Berlin
"Serguei Alex. Oushakine" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.education.scholarships.nis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Position Opening The Institute for East European Studies and the Institute for Ethnology and Social Anthropology at the Freie Universitaet Berlin plan to offer three PhD research positions in the core-group of the project "Accounting for State-building, Stability & Violent Conflict: the Institutional Framework of Caucasian and Central Asian Transitional Societies". The aim of the project is to arrive at a comparative analysis of (official and informal) institutions in Central Asia and the Caucasus and of their capacity to control, prevent or promote conflict. The comparative analysis will draw on case studies prepared by PhD students in cooperation with local researchers during extensive fieldwork in the first stage of the project. The project is financed by the VW-foundation over a period of three years. Compensation will be based on the German standard MTV II a/2 for two positions. The remaining position will be a PhD grant. The ideal applicant would - be ready to define the subject of his/her PhD thesis in accordance with the research-agenda and theoretical framework of the project; - be enthusiastic about working in and on the project's target regions: North Caucasus, South Caucasus, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kirgistan, Kazakhstan - be enthusiastic about working towards innovative and shared results in an interdisciplinary and multinational research-team; - be experienced in fieldwork and the methods of empirical social science; - be responsible and self-supportive in the field, but also be a team player; - have managerial skills (supervision of local researchers in the field); - have excellent command of English oral and written, good knowledge of Russian or at least working knowledge of one more language spoken in the region. Inquiries regarding applications should be submitted no later than 01.06.2002 to Dr. Christoph Zurcher at: [email protected] and Jan Koehler at: [email protected] The positions will begin in Autumn 2002. For further information please consult http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~jkoehler/Index.htm Short description of the project: This comparative, cross-societal project explores the conditions for success and failure in defusing the potential for conflict in the Caucasian and Central Asian societies. The analysis is placed within the context of successful / failed state-building. The analysis begins with the assumption that weak states with low capacities and scarce provision of public goods serve as a breeding ground for violent conflict. Such conflict, on the other hand, is often a means to establish regime stability and may thus serve as a precondition for state-building. Regionally, the project focuses on the 19 successor polities that have emerged in the Caucasus and in Central Asia after the collapse of the Soviet Union[1] ("the CCA-Societies"). From this sample, the project selects at least case studies from Tajikistan, Kirgistan, Uzbekistan, Nagorno-Karabakh, Georgia and Northern Caucasus. Some of these post-socialist societies have successfully managed the transition and have avoided violence. Others have succeeded in polity building, but only at the price of conflict and violence. Some of the new countries have completely failed: they have lost their statehood and internal violence has become endemic. Thus, it is not conflict that needs to be explained, rather the different responses of the various post-socialist societies to the potentials for conflict that arose after the collapse of the central state. Methodologically, the project will rely on a multidisciplinary approach, combining political science, social anthropology and contemporary social history. The institutional framework of the successor states will serve as the focal point in the multidisciplinary approach to analysis. "Institutional framework" refers to the hybrid of institutions derived from the official Soviet institutions (the Soviet legacy), from the unofficial institutions that have emerged as a reaction to the organizational deficits of the Soviet system (such as black market economy or networks of patronage) and from the "traditional" institutions that have survived the Soviet system. By focusing on the institutional framework, the project can depict and understand the incentive structures of local actors engaged in organising or defusing violence. Further, through this focus, the project can understand the micropolitics of local conflict and place them in the wider context of successful or failed state building. The project aims at filling a considerable gap in academic writing on the region. A considerable literature on the region exists, mainly because of its geopolitical importance and of ongoing interstate rivalries. Most of the literature on the Caucasus and on Central Asia, however, stems either from the field of international relations (with limited local knowledge) or from the field of regional studies (which lack an understanding of comparative analyses). The project is founded on the belief that a sound understanding of the political process in the regions must start at the societal level and has to be analysed in a comparative approach. Specifically, the findings of the project will provide valuable insights on the following: (i) the impact of unofficial, non-state institutions on conflict escalation and defusion; (ii) the impact of highly institutionalised networks of patronage; (iii) the conditions for success or failure of ethnic entrepreneurs in weak post soviet states; (iv) the state-building capacities of networks of patronage; (v) the impact of the Soviet institutional legacies for conflict escalation and defusion and (vi) the organisation of sustained violence in weak states. To this end, all case studies will closely take into consideration (i) the heritage of official and unofficial soviet institutions and their capacity to adapt, (ii) local social institutions that emerged as a result of the organisational deficits of the state and (iii) newly invented or imported institutions. Case studies will be investigated through extensive fieldwork and executed by scholars from both Western Europe and from CCA-Countries. The project will be one of the few contemporary research projects that will gather empirical data by means of fieldwork and will not entirely rely on secondary material. Data collected in connection with the project will considerably add to knowledge of the 19 transitional societies and of ongoing conflicts, as well as contribute to theory building, especially in the realm of conflict theory. The results of the project will be published in two volumes: one volume will encompass the case studies, while the second volume will integrate the results of the case-studies into a theoretical framework on post-socialist conflicts. The project will establish and strengthen scientific contacts between researchers in Germany and in the CCA-Countries, thus strengthening the academic capacities in both the CCA-Countries and Germany. Workshops, training sessions, elements of distance learning, jointly-held seminars and jointly conducted fieldwork will prove highly beneficial for both sides. The project aims specifically to integrate research results from the CCA-countries in theory building. Within the framework of the project, at least four PhD students (which positions are open for applicants from all countries) will receive training. [1] For the purpose of this study we define 19 successor polities: Former Soviet Republics / first order units within the Soviet Union: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia , Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kirgistan Second order units: Within Georgia: Abkhazia, Ajaria, South Ossetia Within Azerbaijan: Nagorno Karabakh Within the Russian Federation: Chechnya, Adygeja, Dagestan, Ingushetia, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachayevo-Cherkessia and North-Ossetia.