bug#77928: Regression in Emacs pretest 31.0.90

Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> From: Roshan Shariff <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:02:29 -0600
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], 
> 	[email protected]
> 
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 at 06:48, Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> wrote:
> > And I really don't see any reasons to keep this argument, where it is
> > clear we disagree about fundamental issues, and no one else feels it's
> > important enough to chime in.
> 
> I understand, but can I at least push for reverting this patch?

You already did, and I already said I would like to hear opinions of
others.  Who didn't materialize...

> * It is trying to accommodate a new way of using :custom-face which
> has never been possible in any version of use-package included in
> Emacs.
> 
> * In the process, it breaks a way of using it which has worked
> perfectly well in the past.
> 
> * It makes it impossible for any simple workaround to support the
> existing use case, while trying to support a new use-case that can be
> accommodated without the patch with a simple work-around.
> 
> If we can't agree on how things should work, why not just go with not
> creating a regression? I don't think the behaviour this patch
> introduces is obviously "more correct" so doesn't it make sense to
> stick with the status quo? I would be happy to create a documentation
> patch explaining how to accomplish what the patch author wants, but
> without breaking things for existing users as this patch does.

I'm not even sure we all agree that it's a "regression".  That's why I
asked for opinions in the first place.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.