bug#77928: Regression in Emacs pretest 31.0.90
Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: Roshan Shariff <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:02:29 -0600 > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected] > > On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 at 06:48, Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> wrote: > > And I really don't see any reasons to keep this argument, where it is > > clear we disagree about fundamental issues, and no one else feels it's > > important enough to chime in. > > I understand, but can I at least push for reverting this patch? You already did, and I already said I would like to hear opinions of others. Who didn't materialize... > * It is trying to accommodate a new way of using :custom-face which > has never been possible in any version of use-package included in > Emacs. > > * In the process, it breaks a way of using it which has worked > perfectly well in the past. > > * It makes it impossible for any simple workaround to support the > existing use case, while trying to support a new use-case that can be > accommodated without the patch with a simple work-around. > > If we can't agree on how things should work, why not just go with not > creating a regression? I don't think the behaviour this patch > introduces is obviously "more correct" so doesn't it make sense to > stick with the status quo? I would be happy to create a documentation > patch explaining how to accomplish what the patch author wants, but > without breaking things for existing users as this patch does. I'm not even sure we all agree that it's a "regression". That's why I asked for opinions in the first place.